UNSPSC 51442701: Technetium Tc-99m apcitide or technetium 99mtc apcitide

This classification denotes a radioconjugate with the molecular formula C51H72N17O19S5.TCO.NA.H, a preparation that US FDA regulates as an active ingredient or moiety under Unique Ingredient Identifier IV7T84QA4T, more generally known as Technetium Tc 99m apcitide. The European Medicines Agency schedules Technetium Tc 99m apcitide in its eXtended EudraVigilance Medicinal Product Dictionary or XEVMPD under Index SUB10860MIG. The term Technetium Tc-99m APCITIDE is an International Non-Proprietary Name or INN.

Most nations schedule Technetium Tc-99m apcitide or technetium 99mtc apcitide under HS 28444030.

UNSPSC 51442701 Technetium Tc-99m apcitide or technetium 99mtc apcitide is a Commodity code for a specialized radiopharmaceutical product, yet recent state and local procurement activity under this code does not reflect actual purchases of the product itself. Instead, the posted opportunities show a misalignment between the code designation and the work being solicited — Broward County Aviation Department issued a Request for Information on June 25, 2026 (responses due July 28, 2026) for maintenance services on Rapiscan X-ray inspection systems, and Pasco County, Florida posted a solicitation on June 3, 2026 (due June 26, 2026) for copper sulfate crystals and liquid copper sulfate on an as-needed basis. Neither solicitation relates to the radiopharmaceutical scope the code nominally covers.

The code shows little relevant recent activity tied to its actual product scope. Issuers appear limited to Florida counties in the recent record, with no established pattern of state departments, school districts, transit authorities, or other municipal jurisdictions pursuing this commodity. Without additional opportunities documenting genuine demand for technetium Tc-99m apcitide among state and local buyers, the code does not signal actionable procurement activity for firms in the radiopharmaceutical or nuclear medicine space. The posting date mismatches and product-scope divergence suggest either coding errors in the issuing jurisdictions' procurement systems or that this code remains inactive for state and local purchasing at this time.