UNSPSC 51392411: Dopamine dimethyl ether

This classification denotes a catecholamine with the molecular formula C10H15NO2, a preparation that US FDA regulates as an active ingredient or moiety under Unique Ingredient Identifier IQF9T435OP, chemically known as 2-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)ethylamine, but more generally known as dopamine dimethyl ether, which bears US NIH Compound Identifier 8421. European Medicines Agency schedules dopamine dimethyl ether or its base in its eXtended EudraVigilance Medicinal Product Dictionary or XEVMPD under Index SUB06365MIG.

Most nations, for tariff purposes, schedule dopamine dimethyl ether under HS 29222900. SMILES: COC1CCC(CC1OC)CCN.

UNSPSC 51392411 Dopamine dimethyl ether is a Commodity code that in recent state and local procurement activity covers pharmaceutical and medical supply products, though the code designation does not align cleanly with the actual goods being solicited. Seminole County, Florida solicited naloxone and safe drug deactivation systems under this code in a competitive bidding process (IFB60459723LAS), indicating that the code may be used by health and human services procurement offices to tag pharmaceutical inventory, medical countermeasures, and harm-reduction supplies rather than the specific chemical compound its name suggests. State and local issuers using this code include county-level health departments and community health initiatives focused on public health emergency response and substance-abuse prevention.

Recent activity appears limited to Florida, with Seminole County soliciting 1,900 units of naloxone and 800 safe drug deactivation systems annually through competitive bid (response due July 26, 2023), with quarterly deliveries required to the Seminole County Community Health Building in Sanford. The contract carried a two-year initial term with one-year renewal option, fixed-fee pricing, and potential FEMA funding. Vendors must comply with E-Verify, drug-free workplace certification, and federal environmental regulations. The limited posting history suggests this code sees infrequent use in state and local procurement; practitioners should verify code alignment with customer procurement offices before pursuing opportunities tagged under it, as the mismatch between the code name and actual solicitation scope signals potential catalog or tagging inconsistency.