UNSPSC 51373101: Diethylthiambutene

This classification denotes an opioid receptor agonist with the molecular formula C16H21NS2, a preparation that US FDA regulates as an active ingredient or moiety under Unique Ingredient Identifier 2Z91X9052O, chemically known as 3-diethylamino-1,1-dithienylbut-1-ene but generally known as diethylthiambutene, which bears US NIH Compound Identifier 6833. European Medicines Agency schedules Diethylthiambutene in its eXtended EudraVigilance Medicinal Product Dictionary or XEVMPD under Index SUB07113MIG. The term DIETHYLTHIAMBUTENE is an International Non-Proprietary Name.

UNSPSC 51373101 Diethylthiambutene is a Commodity code that shows a substantial mismatch between its nominal scope and the work actually being solicited under it in state and local procurement. The recent opportunity posted under this code — Seminole County, Florida's IFB for Naloxone and Safe Drug Deactivation Systems — concerns the procurement of naloxone (an opioid antagonist used in overdose reversal) and drug deactivation systems, neither of which are diethylthiambutene. The code appears to be a tagging artifact rather than an accurate reflection of the products being bought.

Seminole County's IFB 60459723LAS, posted June 30, 2026 with a response deadline of July 26, 2023, seeks 1,900 units of naloxone and 800 safe drug deactivation systems annually with quarterly deliveries to the Seminole County Community Health Building in Sanford, Florida. The procurement requires vendors to submit bids electronically through the county's e-Procurement Portal, include all shipping and delivery costs in their proposals, provide unit costs for each line item, and meet standard compliance requirements including drug-free workplace certification and E-Verify eligibility verification. The contract carries a two-year initial term with an optional one-year renewal, and vendors must maintain workers' compensation, commercial general liability, and professional liability insurance. No explicit set-aside designations are specified. Given the fundamental misalignment between the code's nominal substance and the actual scope of work, this code does not present a reliable signal for business development under its stated commodity definition.