UNSPSC 51332882: Triflupromazine hydrochloride

This classification denotes a phenothiazine and antipsychotic agent with the molecular formula C18H19F3N2S.ClH, a preparation that US FDA regulates as an active ingredient or moiety under Unique Ingredient Identifier 9E75N4A5HM, chemically known as 10h-phenothiazine-10-propanamine, n, n-dimethyl-2- (trifluoromethyl)-, monohydrochloride but more generally known as triflupromazine hydrochloride, which bears US NIH Compound Identifier 5568.

UNSPSC 51332882 Triflupromazine hydrochloride is a Commodity code whose nominal scope does not align with recent state and local procurement activity under this designation. The single recent opportunity posted under the code — Seminole County, Florida's IFB for Naloxone and Safe Drug Deactivation Systems — solicits emergency medical and harm-reduction products rather than the antipsychotic pharmaceutical the code name suggests. The mismatch indicates either a tagging error by the issuing body or a data-entry anomaly. Triflupromazine hydrochloride, an older first-generation antipsychotic, has seen limited use in clinical practice for decades, and state and local governments do not typically procure branded pharmaceuticals through commodity codes or competitive sealed bids; such purchases flow through state pharmaceutical benefit managers, group purchasing organizations, or cooperative purchasing agreements.

Seminole County's July 2026 IFB requested 1,900 units of Naloxone and 800 Safe Drug Deactivation Systems annually with quarterly deliveries to the Seminole County Community Health Building in Sanford, Florida, response deadline July 26, 2023. The procurement requires vendors to submit electronic bids through the county's e-Procurement Portal, include all shipping and delivery costs, maintain workers' compensation and general liability insurance, comply with E-Verify requirements, and hold drug-free workplace certification. The contract is structured as a fixed-fee award with a two-year initial term and one-year renewal option, subject to a three-month probationary period. No explicit set-aside designations were stated. The single recent record provides insufficient basis to characterize issuing-body mix, geographic concentration, or purchasing patterns under this code. The divergence between the code's nominal scope and the actual solicitation suggests that this code does not support a reliable signal for state and local procurement strategy.