UNSPSC 51332875: Thioproperazine dimesilate

This classification denotes an antipsychotic agent with the molecular formula C22H30N4O2S2.2CH4O3S, a preparation that US FDA regulates as an active ingredient or moiety under Unique Ingredient Identifier 71P630M192, chemically known as n,n-dimethyl-10-(3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)propyl)-10h-phenothiazine-2-sulfonamide, dimethanesulfonate, but more generally known as thioproperazine dimesilate, which bears US NIH Compound Identifier 92178.

European Medicines Agency schedules thioproperazine dimesilate or its base in its eXtended EudraVigilance Medicinal Product Dictionary or XEVMPD under Index SUB10983MIG. Most nations, for tariff purposes, schedule thioproperazine dimesilate under HS 29350090. SMILES: CN1CCN(CC1)CCCN2C3CCCCC3SC4C2CC(CC4)S(=O)(=O)N(C)C.CS(=O)(=O)O.CS(=O)(=O)O.

UNSPSC 51332875 Thioproperazine dimesilate is a Commodity code that captures pharmaceutical products state and local health agencies purchase, though recent sourced opportunities show little activity tagged to this specific compound. The single recent opportunity in the dataset—Seminole County, Florida's IFB60459723LAS—reflects a significant mismatch: the county is procuring naloxone and drug deactivation systems for community health initiatives, not thioproperazine dimesilate. This divergence suggests the code may be underutilized, misapplied, or rarely solicited by state and local jurisdictions in practice, or that purchasing offices tag general pharmaceutical or health-related products without precision to the UNSPSC Commodity tier.

Seminole County issued the naloxone procurement as an IFB with a response deadline of July 26, 2023, seeking 1,900 units of naloxone and 800 safe drug deactivation systems annually with quarterly deliveries to the Seminole County Community Health Building in Sanford, Florida. The contract offered a two-year initial term with a one-year renewal option, required E-Verify compliance, drug-free workplace certification, and standard commercial general liability and workers' compensation insurance. Bidders submitted electronically through the county's e-Procurement Portal and included all shipping and delivery costs in proposals. The procurement was potentially funded through FEMA, introducing federal compliance requirements including the Clean Air Act and Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Given the narrow recent-opportunity sample and the disconnect between the code's nominal scope and actual procurement activity, vendors should verify current buying patterns under this code before prioritizing pursuit.