UNSPSC 51293606: Ciclazindol

This classification denotes an antidepressant agent with the molecular formula C17H15ClN2O, a preparation that US FDA regulates as an active ingredient or moiety under Unique Ingredient Identifier Y3I9520J7P, chemically known as 10-(m-chlorophenyl)-2,3,4,10-tetrahydropyrimido(1,2-a)indol-10-ol but generally known as ciclazindol, which bears US NIH Compound Identifier 37825. European Medicines Agency schedules Ciclazindol in its eXtended EudraVigilance Medicinal Product Dictionary or XEVMPD under Index SUB06235MIG.

UNSPSC 51293606 Ciclazindol, a Commodity code, nominally designates a pharmaceutical compound, but the single recent state and local opportunity solicited under it shows no actual procurement of ciclazindol itself. Instead, Seminole County, Florida posted IFB60459723LAS seeking 1,900 units of naloxone and 800 safe drug deactivation systems annually, with quarterly deliveries to the Seminole County Community Health Building in Sanford. The mismatch between the code's nominal scope and the work actually being bought suggests this code carries minimal relevant activity in state and local procurement right now. The opportunity specifies a competitive bidding process with electronic submission through the county's e-Procurement Portal, all-inclusive pricing, and compliance requirements including drug-free workplace certification, E-Verify authorization, workers' compensation and general liability insurance, and a three-month probationary period. The contract structure calls for an initial two-year term with a one-year renewal option and was posted June 30, 2026, with a response deadline of July 26, 2023 — a date inconsistency in the source that suggests data quality issues.

This code appears largely inactive in state and local procurement beyond the single Seminole County opportunity. Geographic coverage is limited to Florida based on available records. The solicitation mentions potential FEMA funding, which introduces federal compliance overlays including the Clean Air Act and Federal Water Pollution Control Act, though the procurement itself is driven by the county health agency. No set-aside designations or preferences for disadvantaged enterprises are specified. Given the sparse recent activity and the substantial mismatch between the code designation and actual procurement need, firms evaluating this code should conduct direct outreach to Florida public health agencies rather than rely on UNSPSC taxonomy matching for opportunity discovery.