UNSPSC 51262606: Imiloxan hydrochloride

This classification denotes an alpha-adrenergic blocking agent C14H16N2O2.ClH, a preparation that US FDA regulates as an active ingredient or moiety under Unique Ingredient Identifier X72FO6ZLZY, chemically known as (+/-)-2-(1,4-benzodioxan-2-ylmethyl)-1-ethylimidazole monohydrochloride, but more generally known as imiloxan hydrochloride, which bears US NIH Compound Identifier 172975. Most nations, for tariff and trade purposes, schedule imiloxan hydrochloride under HS 29349990 and SITC 51579. As of Q4 2014, IMILOXAN HYDROCHLORIDE remains US FDA's Preferred Term for this commodity.

Imiloxan hydrochloride bears US NLM identifiers UMLS ID C2827196 and NCI Concept Code C83793. SMILES: CCN1CCNC1CC2COC3CCCCC3O2.CL.

UNSPSC 51262606 Imiloxan hydrochloride is a Commodity code for a specific pharmaceutical product, but the recent state and local procurement activity under this code shows a significant mismatch: Seminole County, Florida's solicitation is tagged to the code but actually procures naloxone and safe drug deactivation systems rather than imiloxan hydrochloride. The scope of work reflects community health and opioid-response initiatives, with vendors supplying pharmaceutical and related harm-reduction equipment on a fixed-fee basis under competitive bidding. Issuing bodies using this code appear limited to county-level health or public-health departments, though the recent activity is sparse and concentrated in a single jurisdiction.

Seminole County posted IFB 60459723LAS on June 30, 2026, with a response deadline of July 26, 2023, seeking 1,900 units of naloxone and 800 safe drug deactivation systems annually with quarterly deliveries to the Seminole County Community Health Building in Sanford, Florida. The contract runs for an initial two-year term with one-year renewal option; bidders must include all shipping and delivery costs and comply with E-Verify, drug-free workplace certification, and specific insurance requirements. The procurement may be FEMA-funded, introducing federal compliance obligations including the Clean Air Act and Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Beyond this single recent opportunity, the code shows minimal activity in state and local procurement, suggesting either limited use or a classification mismatch between the code's nominal scope and actual procurement patterns.