UNSPSC 51143110: Triethanolamine salicylate

This classification denotes a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug with the molecular formula C7H6O3.C6H15NO3, a preparation that US FDA regulates as an active ingredient or moiety under Unique Ingredient Identifier H8O4040BHD, chemically known as 2-hydroxybenzoic acid, compd. with 2,2,2-nitrilotris(ethanol) (1:1) but generally known as tea-salicylate, which bears US NIH Compound Identifier 25213. European Medicines Agency schedules Trolamine salicylate in its eXtended EudraVigilance Medicinal Product Dictionary or XEVMPD under Index SUB04990MIG.

Most nations schedule triethanolamine salicylate under HS 29221300 and SITC 51461. SMILES: C1=CC=C(C(=C1)C(=O)O)O.C(CO)N(CCO)CCO.

UNSPSC 51143110 Triethanolamine salicylate is a Commodity code for a specific chemical compound, but the most recent state and local contract opportunities tagged under it do not reflect procurement of that substance. The City of Austin posted an IFB on July 27, 2026 for liquid aluminum sulfate (alum) used in wastewater treatment phosphorus removal, and the City of Tampa posted an ITB on April 24, 2026 for medical aid supplies including antiseptic sprays, hydrogen peroxide, aspirin, and bandages. Neither solicitation matches the code's nominal product scope. The code shows minimal alignment with actual state and local procurement activity under its UNSPSC designation.

The two recent opportunities span different issuing bodies and geographic regions with no apparent connection to triethanolamine salicylate procurement. The Austin Water opportunity targets a specialized industrial chemical input for municipal wastewater treatment with estimated annual volume of 179,200 gallons, firm unit pricing for 12 months, and stringent NSF and AWWA standards compliance; the Tampa Fire Rescue opportunity covers retail medical and first aid supplies with annual budget of $100,000, small-business and minority-business set-asides offering discounts up to $20,000, and a nine-month minimum expiration requirement. The divergence between the code's nominal product and the actual solicitations suggests either persistent tagging errors in the underlying data or that this code experiences little genuine procurement activity aligned with its chemical specification. Business development professionals should verify the correct UNSPSC classification before pursuing opportunities in either category.