UNSPSC 50611820: Canned or jarred Non GMO flageolet beans

The variety of Non GMO beans known as Non GMO flageolet beans that have been canned or jarred for preservation. This means that they are produced without the use of methods that genetically modify organisms by means that are not possible under natural conditions. Such methods include cell fusion, microencapsulation and macro-encapsulation, and recombinant DNA technology (including gene deletion, gene doubling, introducing a foreign gene, and changing the positions of genes when achieved by recombinant DNA technology).

Traditional methods of breeding, conjugation, fermentation, hybridization, in vitro fertilization, or tissue culture are considered to be non-GMO.

UNSPSC 50611820 Canned or jarred non-GMO flageolet beans is a Commodity code that represents a narrow product line within food service procurement. State and local governments rarely issue solicitations targeting flageolet beans specifically; instead, they procure canned or jarred legumes as line items within broader food-service RFPs and IFBs that span dozens or hundreds of food categories. When flageolet beans do appear on those rosters, they are typically one option among many canned vegetables or proteins in meal programs operated by state institutions, school districts, or other public entities.

The recent opportunities block shows no solicitations dedicated to flageolet beans. The nine state and local food-service procurements posted between May and October 2026 — including Texas Health and Human Services Commission bids for state-supported living centers, Oregon Department of Corrections canned-tomato procurement, Ben Hill County Schools nutrition program, Burke County Public Schools food bid, Gwinnett County food-item purchase, Texas Department of Criminal Justice cafeteria products, and Illinois state hospital food orders — all encompass canned and jarred vegetables as line-item components within much larger mixed-food portfolios, but none isolate flageolet beans or flag them as a primary focus. The code sees no standalone activity in the recent record. Business development professionals should treat this code as a subordinate line item within broader food-service and institutional-meal RFPs, RFQs, and IFBs issued by state departments, county nutrition programs, school boards, correctional facilities, and social-services agencies across Texas, Georgia, Oregon, and Illinois, rather than as a direct procurement opportunity.