UNSPSC 50566928: Non GMO rambuta purees

The variety of non GMO fruits known as non GMO rambutan which have been pureed

UNSPSC 50566928 Non GMO rambuta purees, a Commodity code, shows minimal recent alignment with the state and local procurement activities indexed under it. The code's nominal scope—non-GMO rambutan fruit products—does not match the actual goods being solicited in the recent opportunity record, which centers on conventional canned applesauce, dried fruit bars, weekly food orders, institutional food and consumable products, fresh produce, cafeteria staples, and grocery items for schools, correctional facilities, and state health agencies. The mismatch signals that either the code assignment is incorrect in the source system, or the code has been applied to a broader food procurement category that extends well beyond the specialty rambutan product implied by the code name.

Activity under this code tier is driven primarily by school districts, state departments (corrections, health and human services), and county boards of education across the South and Midwest. Recent solicitations from Oregon Department of Corrections (ITB for canned applesauce, due July 31, 2026), Austin Independent School District (RFP for dried fruit bars and apple crisps, due July 16, 2026), Illinois Chief Procurement Office (quarterly food orders, due June 17, 2026), Texas Health and Human Services Commission (IFB for food and consumables, due July 13, 2026), and multiple school districts in Georgia, Missouri, Texas, and Connecticut (ranging from fresh produce RFPs and ITBs through June 2026) comprise the bulk of recent postings. The contract values visible in the record span institutional scale—Texas HHSC food procurement historically valued at $1.5 million annually, Douglas County Schools food supply at approximately $9 million annually, and GEC cooperative fresh produce at $4.4 to $1.1 million per area. Firms pursuing this activity should verify UNSPSC code accuracy in their CRM systems before investing in pursuit strategy, as the code-to-procurement mismatch limits its utility for filtering relevant opportunities.