UNSPSC 50545833: Frozen non GMO governor's plum

The variety of non GMO plums known as non GMO governor's plum that have been frozen for preservation. This means that they are produced without the use of methods that genetically modify organisms by means that are not possible under natural conditions. Such methods include cell fusion, microencapsulation and macro-encapsulation, and recombinant DNA technology (including gene deletion, gene doubling, introducing a foreign gene, and changing the positions of genes when achieved by recombinant DNA technology).

Traditional methods of breeding, conjugation, fermentation, hybridization, in vitro fertilization, or tissue culture are considered to be non-GMO.

UNSPSC 50545833 Frozen non-GMO governor's plum (Commodity) does not appear in recent state and local procurement activity. The most recent opportunities posted under this code span June 2026 back to January 2026 and include school district grocery bids, fresh produce solicitations, and food supply contracts for child nutrition programs across Georgia, Missouri, and Connecticut—none of which reference frozen governor's plum or specify plum products of any kind. The code's nominal scope diverges sharply from what state and local jurisdictions are actually buying: school districts are procuring comprehensive frozen and fresh grocery items, produce bundles encompassing dozens of line items (apples, berries, vegetables, citrus, leafy greens, and specialty items), and main-line food service distribution across hundreds of food categories to support federal school lunch and breakfast programs.

State and local purchasing under what appears to be this code shows no recent activity specifically targeting frozen non-GMO plum products. School districts and county education boards—Bridgeport (Connecticut), Hancock County (Georgia), Early County (Georgia), Decatur (Georgia), Savannah-Chatham County (Georgia), Rockwood R-VI (Missouri), and Douglas County (Georgia) through the GEC Buying Cooperative—are soliciting food service contracts through RFP, RFQ, and IFB notices, but none reference plum products as line items or enumerate them in their scope documents. The code shows little to no relevance to current state and local procurement demand in this category.