UNSPSC 50533664: Dried non GMO white riesling grapes

The variety of non GMO wine grapes known as non GMO white riesling grapes that have been dried for preservation. This means that they are produced without the use of methods that genetically modify organisms by means that are not possible under natural conditions. Such methods include cell fusion, microencapsulation and macro-encapsulation, and recombinant DNA technology (including gene deletion, gene doubling, introducing a foreign gene, and changing the positions of genes when achieved by recombinant DNA technology).

Traditional methods of breeding, conjugation, fermentation, hybridization, in vitro fertilization, or tissue culture are considered to be non-GMO.

UNSPSC 50533664 Dried non-GMO white riesling grapes, a Commodity code, shows minimal recent state and local procurement activity directly aligned with its nominal scope. The six recent opportunities on file span school district nutrition programs, senior meal services, and institutional food procurement, but none explicitly name dried grapes or wine-related agricultural products as line items. The City of Bridgeport Department of Public Purchases sought grocery items including fruits and vegetables for the Board of Education's Food & Nutrition Services; the Hancock County Board of Education requested fresh produce including berries, citrus, and specialty fruits; the Texas Health and Human Services Commission solicited food and consumable products for the El Paso State Supported Living Center; Hillsborough County sought senior meal preparation and delivery services; the State of Georgia posted an open food, supplies, and kitchen products procurement; and the Pascagoula-Gautier School District in Mississippi sought packaged meal boxes for its summer food service program. None of these solicitations identify dried grapes, raisins, or wine-grape derivatives as specified items or line-item categories. The code appears to reflect a narrow agricultural commodity that does not map consistently to the broader institutional food procurement and nutrition services contracts state and local agencies are actively soliciting.

Geographic activity spans Connecticut, Texas, Georgia, Florida, and Mississippi based on recent postings, but without corresponding dried-grape demand signals. School districts and county nutrition programs dominate the issuing-body mix, with independent health and human services agencies also present. The lack of solicitation specificity around this commodity—paired with the absence of any posted opportunity naming dried non-GMO white riesling grapes or functionally equivalent products—indicates limited current market opportunity under this code. Firms positioned in specialty agricultural commodity supply should monitor cooperative purchasing vehicles and state-level food-service aggregators, but the recent opportunity stream does not support active pursuit at this time.