UNSPSC 50525875: Non GMO sloe plum

The variety of non GMO plums known as non GMO sloe plum. This means that they are produced without the use of methods that genetically modify organisms by means that are not possible under natural conditions. Such methods include cell fusion, microencapsulation and macro-encapsulation, and recombinant DNA technology (including gene deletion, gene doubling, introducing a foreign gene, and changing the positions of genes when achieved by recombinant DNA technology).

Traditional methods of breeding, conjugation, fermentation, hybridization, in vitro fertilization, or tissue culture are considered to be non-GMO.

UNSPSC 50525875 Non GMO sloe plum is a Commodity code that shows minimal recent state and local procurement activity aligned with its nominal scope. The single recent opportunity tagged under this code—Madison Metropolitan School District's RFB 4162 for petite bananas, due July 29, 2026—involves banana supply to a school food service, not sloe plums or plum products of any kind. The code's abstract name and the actual work being solicited diverge significantly, indicating either a tagging mismatch in the source data or that sloe plum procurement does not currently generate measurable state and local demand through posted solicitations.

School districts across Georgia and Texas dominate recent produce procurement activity in the broader fresh-produce space, but none of the opportunities in the dataset target sloe plums or non-GMO plum varieties specifically. Repeat buyers include Madison Metropolitan School District, Liberty County Board of Education, Glynn County Board of Education, and Douglas County School System, all soliciting fresh produce for child nutrition programs under RFB, IFB, and RFP vehicles with response dates spanning February through July 2026. Geographic activity clusters in Georgia (at least eight districts posting fresh-produce solicitations since February 2026) and Texas, with isolated activity in Florida and Wisconsin. Given the absence of sloe plum solicitations in the recent-opportunities record and the clear mismatch between the code's name and the petite-banana opportunity, the code warrants a skip pending clarification of its actual use in state and local procurement taxonomy.