UNSPSC 50525867: Non GMO rich red plums

The variety of non GMO plums known as non GMO rich red plums. This means that they are produced without the use of methods that genetically modify organisms by means that are not possible under natural conditions. Such methods include cell fusion, microencapsulation and macro-encapsulation, and recombinant DNA technology (including gene deletion, gene doubling, introducing a foreign gene, and changing the positions of genes when achieved by recombinant DNA technology).

Traditional methods of breeding, conjugation, fermentation, hybridization, in vitro fertilization, or tissue culture are considered to be non-GMO.

UNSPSC 50525867 Non GMO rich red plums (Commodity) shows minimal relevant recent activity. The code's nominal scope—non-GMO red plums as a specialty produce item—does not align with the state and local school nutrition solicitations dominating the recent-opportunities block. Those opportunities span broad fresh-produce procurement for school districts, focusing on apples, bananas, berries, vegetables, and eggs across multiple line items and weekly delivery models, rather than plums as a standalone commodity.

The recent opportunities instead reflect school nutrition program purchasing across Georgia, Texas, and Florida, with issuing bodies including Madison Metropolitan School District, Hancock County Board of Education, Bartow County School System, Bulloch County School District, Liberty County Board of Education, Muscogee County School District, Savannah-Chatham County Public School System, Glynn County Board of Education, McAllen Independent School District, Austin Independent School District, and Douglas County School System via the GEC Buying Cooperative. These school districts compete for annual produce contracts through RFPs, RFQs, and IFBs, with response dates clustering in March through July 2026 and contract terms running July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027. Georgia school districts represent the heaviest concentration of recent activity, with Texas and Florida also active. The code itself does not support meaningful market characterization at the plum-specific commodity level; pursue only if your firm holds existing relationships with school districts already sourcing specialty produce items or operates as a regional produce distributor competing on multi-item school nutrition bids where plums are incidental to broader produce supply.