UNSPSC 50522905: Non GMO gundila dates

The variety of non GMO dates known as non GMO gundila dates. This means that they are produced without the use of methods that genetically modify organisms by means that are not possible under natural conditions. Such methods include cell fusion, microencapsulation and macro-encapsulation, and recombinant DNA technology (including gene deletion, gene doubling, introducing a foreign gene, and changing the positions of genes when achieved by recombinant DNA technology).

Traditional methods of breeding, conjugation, fermentation, hybridization, in vitro fertilization, or tissue culture are considered to be non-GMO.

UNSPSC 50522905 Non GMO gundila dates (Commodity) does not align with the state and local procurement activity documented in recent opportunities, which are dominated by fresh produce sourcing for school nutrition programs rather than specialized date varieties. The recent solicitations show extensive buying of conventional fresh fruits and vegetables—apples, bananas, berries, peppers, carrots, leafy greens, citrus, and melons—across school districts, with no record of gundila date procurement or non-GMO specialty dates in any of the posted RFPs, RFQs, or ITBs. School districts issue the overwhelming majority of solicitations under codes in this family, with Georgia school districts (Madison Metropolitan, Hancock County, Bartow County, Early County, Liberty County, Muscogee County, Savannah-Chatham County, Glynn County, and Douglas County School System) representing the densest activity, alongside Texas districts (McAllen, Austin Independent School District) and Florida's Hillsborough County Public Schools. State-level activity appears minimal—the State of Georgia issued one food-supplies RFP in May 2026 with limited detail provided. Georgia and Texas dominate recent posting dates between February and July 2026, with all school nutrition solicitations emphasizing domestic sourcing preferences, HACCP compliance, Buy American provisions, and weekly delivery to multiple school sites.

The code shows little relevant recent activity for the gundila date commodity specifically. No state or local procurement office has posted opportunities matching the code's nominal scope; the mismatch between the code name and actual market activity suggests either misclassification at the state and local level or minimal institutional demand for non-GMO gundila dates in school meal programs. Business development professionals should treat this code as inactive for current state and local procurement purposes and monitor whether school districts or other public bodies begin sourcing specialty dates or non-GMO date varieties in the coming procurement cycle.