UNSPSC 50436836: Dried organic lily bulb

The type of organic vegetable known as organic lily bulb that has been dried for preservation.

UNSPSC 50436836 Dried organic lily bulb (Commodity) does not align with the state and local procurement activity captured under this code in recent months. The most-recent-opportunities block contains six solicitations, none of which request dried organic lily bulbs; instead, they seek dried beans (kidney, black, pinto, and red), cafeteria food products, and general food supplies for institutional meal service. Georgia Correctional Industries solicited kidney beans (RFQ 92100ERFQ0020612027, due October 9, 2026); the Oregon Department of Corrections sought approximately 42,500 pounds of dried pinto and red beans (IFB S2910000017705, due June 19, 2026); and the State of Oregon posted a separate bid for dried black beans, triple-cleaned (S2910000017705, due August 21, 2026). The City of Edinburg, Texas, issued an RFP for a Child and Adult Care Food Program meal service covering beverages, paper goods, proteins, cheese, breads, fruits, vegetables, snacks, janitorial supplies, and nonfood items (RFP 2026-017, due August 4, 2026). The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, on behalf of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, solicited cafeteria food products spanning proteins, frozen specialty entrees, dairy, grains, beverages, and condiments through multiple TDCJ warehouse locations (IFB 304T26300CF, originally due April 21, 2026, extended to May 4, 2026). The State of Illinois requested weekly food-order fulfillment for the July–September quarter (FY-27 IVHQ, due June 26, 2026). State purchasing offices, correctional institutions, and food-service programs are the primary issuing bodies.

Activity is concentrated in Georgia, Oregon, Texas, and Illinois. Institutional food procurement—dried legumes for bulk meal preparation, cafeteria proteins and staples, and program food supply—dominates the recent-opportunities block, with no recent solicitation matching the dried organic lily bulb commodity code. The mismatch suggests either a tagging error in the source data or a code that sees minimal state and local procurement activity. Buyers pursuing this code should verify current activity independently and consider whether broader dried-goods or specialty-produce codes align more closely with target customer demand.