UNSPSC 50365337: Canned or jarred lindo peaches

The variety of peaches known as lindo peaches that have been canned or jarred for preservation.

UNSPSC 50365337 Canned or jarred lindo peaches (Commodity) represents a narrow product category within food service procurement that state and local governments rarely source directly; recent opportunities reveal significant mismatch between the code's nominal scope and actual buying activity. The posted opportunities tagged to this code cover canned applesauce, dried fruit bars, weekly food orders with brand-specific requirements, fresh produce, eggs, comprehensive food supply and distribution, and other products that fall outside the definition of canned or jarred peaches. The issuing bodies include state corrections departments, school districts (independent and county-based), state health and human services commissions, and school boards across multiple states. When canned fruit products do appear in state and local food service solicitations, they are typically components of larger commodity bundles rather than standalone line items, and sourcing is driven by operational food service needs rather than specific fruit type procurement.

The code shows little relevant recent activity centered on canned or jarred peaches specifically. The Oregon Department of Corrections issued ITB S-29100-00017453 (due July 31, 2026) for canned fruit applesauce at 4,760 cases with a historical price of $21.84 per case, and Texas Health and Human Services Commission and the Department of State Health Services issued IFB HHS0016792 covering supplemental food and consumable products including canned goods for state hospitals and supported living centers statewide with a maximum potential contract value of $4.5 million over three years. School districts in Georgia, Missouri, Texas, and Connecticut are actively procuring fresh produce, eggs, and comprehensive food supply through IFBs and RFPs during the 2026-27 school year, but these opportunities do not target canned peaches specifically. The mismatch between code name and actual solicitation content suggests either tagging error in state and local procurement systems or that canned peaches are treated as incidental line items within broader food commodity contracts rather than as standalone procurement objectives.