UNSPSC 50365039: Canned or jarred sanguinelli oranges

The variety of oranges known as sanguinelli oranges that have been canned or jarred for preservation.

UNSPSC 50365039 Canned or jarred sanguinelli oranges (Commodity) shows limited relevance to current state and local procurement activity. While the code nominally describes canned citrus fruit, recent opportunities tagged under this classification instead solicit canned applesauce, dried fruit bars, apple crisps, and broad food service consumables spanning proteins, dairy, produce, and staple groceries. The issuing bodies are primarily state corrections and health agencies, school districts, and one city nutrition center—spanning Oregon Department of Corrections, Texas HHSC, school nutrition programs across Georgia, Missouri, Texas, Connecticut, and Douglas County, Georgia, plus Bridgeport, Connecticut. Geographic activity concentrates in the South and Southwest (Texas, Georgia, Oregon, Missouri, Connecticut), reflecting school nutrition procurement cycles and institutional food service requirements.

Representative recent opportunities include Oregon Department of Corrections ITB S-29100-00017453 for 4,760 cases of canned applesauce due July 31, 2026, under ITB with Oregon-goods and Oregon-bidder preferences totaling 10 percent; Austin Independent School District RFP 27RFP004 for dried fruit bars and apple crisps due July 16, 2026; Texas HHSC IFB HHS0017449 for food and consumables at El Paso State Supported Living Center due July 13, 2026 with estimated historical value of $1.5 million; and multiple school nutrition RFPs from Hancock County (Georgia), Bridgeport (Connecticut), Rockwood (Missouri), Liberty County (Georgia), and Muscogee County (Georgia) spanning fresh produce, staple groceries, and prepared foods. School districts dominate the activity, typically issuing annual IFBs with delivery to central warehouses or multiple school sites, Buy American compliance requirements, firm fixed pricing for 12-month periods, and Net 30 to Net 45 payment terms. The code itself shows minimal specificity—actual procurement spans general food service categories rather than canned citrus, signaling either taxonomy misclassification in source filings or a code seldom used for its stated commodity.