UNSPSC 50363602: Canned or jarred barbera grapes

The variety of wine grapes known as barbera grapes that have been canned or jarred for preservation.

UNSPSC 50363602 Canned or jarred barbera grapes (Commodity) does not align with the recent state and local procurement activity tagged under this code. The opportunities posted against this code overwhelmingly solicit canned and fresh produce items—applesauce, dried fruit bars, fresh produce, and eggs—across school nutrition programs, state corrections facilities, health and human services centers, and institutional food service operations, but none specifically target canned or jarred barbera grapes. The code's nominal scope appears disconnected from what state and local buyers are actually purchasing under this taxonomy entry.

State and local food service procurement under this code's activity spans school districts (Fairfax County Public Schools, Austin ISD, Rockwood R-VI, Hancock County, Liberty County, Savannah-Chatham, Dallas ISD, Douglas County), state agencies (Oregon Department of Corrections, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Illinois Chief Procurement Office, Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts), and county educational bodies (Muscogee County, Savannah-Chatham), issued primarily as ITBs, RFPs, and RFQs with response dates ranging from early June through late July 2026. Geographic activity clusters in Texas, Georgia, Oregon, Missouri, Connecticut, and Virginia. The actual buying under codes tagged here includes institutional canned fruit (applesauce at $21.84 per case through the Oregon Department of Corrections ITB S-29100-00017453, due July 31, 2026), fresh produce delivered weekly to multiple school sites, bulk grocery items for child nutrition programs, and specialty food products for state-supported living centers and correctional facilities. Buy American requirements, USDA commodity compliance, firm fixed pricing including delivery charges, and liability insurance minimums of $1 million are standard terms across these solicitations. The mismatch between the commodity code name and the actual buying activity suggests either a tagging error in the state and local procurement system or a code that has drifted from current purchasing practice.