UNSPSC 50363408: Canned or jarred barlinka grapes

The variety of table grapes known as barlinka grapes that have been canned or jarred for preservation.

UNSPSC 50363408 Canned or jarred barlinka grapes, a Commodity code, does not reflect the work actually being solicited under this code in recent state and local procurement. The recent opportunities tagged with this code involve canned fruit applesauce, dried fruit bars, apple crisps, fresh produce, eggs, and broad food and consumable products for correctional facilities, state supported living centers, and school nutrition programs—none of which are barlinka grapes or other jarred grape products. The code's nominal scope and recent procurement activity are substantially misaligned.

State and local issuing bodies tagging opportunities under this code include the Oregon Department of Corrections, the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts on behalf of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, the Texas Education Agency, multiple Georgia school districts, the City of Bridgeport Connecticut, and the State of Illinois, indicating broad use across state agencies, correctional systems, human services, and school nutrition programs. Representative recent opportunities include the Oregon Department of Corrections ITB for canned fruit applesauce (approximately 4,760 cases, due July 31, 2026), the Austin Independent School District RFP for dried fruit bars and apple crisps (due July 16, 2026), and the Douglas County School System RFP for fresh produce and eggs serving 30 school districts across two Georgia regions with estimated annual spending of approximately $4.4 million for Area One and $1.1 million for Area Two (due March 4, 2026). Geographic activity spans Oregon, Texas, Georgia, Connecticut, Illinois, and Missouri, with school nutrition procurement concentrated in the Southeast and Texas, and state facility food service concentrated in Texas and the Pacific Northwest. The code shows consistent recent activity but primarily in commodity food categories unrelated to the barlinka grape product specification, suggesting either systematic miscoding of food procurement opportunities or abandonment of the code's original product scope in favor of broader food-commodity tagging.