UNSPSC 50344406: Frozen fairchild oranges

The variety of mandarin oranges and tangerines known as fairchild oranges that have been frozen for preservation.

UNSPSC 50344406 Frozen fairchild oranges, a Commodity code, does not map to meaningful recent state and local procurement activity. Of the 25 recent opportunities tagged under this code, none solicits frozen Fairchild oranges or any citrus product matching the code's nominal scope—instead, the block contains school district, state hospital, county corrections, and child nutrition program food service contracts spanning fresh produce, frozen vegetables and berries, ice cream, groceries, and comprehensive food supply across multiple categories. The code appears to have been applied to these broader food procurement solicitations in error, making it unsuitable as a targeting filter for vendors specializing in frozen citrus supply.

State and local procurement under this code shows no distinct pattern. School districts dominate the issuing bodies—Hancock County and Bulloch County in Georgia, Bridgeport and New Jersey school nutrition programs, Rockwood R-VI in Missouri, Savannah-Chatham County in Georgia, Henry County in Georgia, and others—alongside state health agencies (Texas HHS, New Jersey Department of Human Services), county corrections facilities (Santa Clara County), and child nutrition nonprofits (Head Start of Greater Dallas). Geographic distribution spans Texas, Georgia, Connecticut, Missouri, Oregon, California, and New Jersey. Recent high-value opportunities include Douglas County School System's $9 million food supply and distribution RFP (due February 18, 2026), the GEC Buying Cooperative Fresh Produce and Eggs RFP covering 30 districts with $5.5 million estimated annual spend (due March 4, 2026), and Hillsborough County Public Schools' USDA Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program contract with an estimated $600,000 annual budget (proposals due March 11, 2026). However, none of these solicitations explicitly name frozen Fairchild oranges, and the code's labeling suggests poor taxonomy alignment rather than a coherent procurement category worth pursuing based on this code designation alone.