UNSPSC 50331707: Dried organic gros michel bananas

The variety of organic bananas known as organic gros michel bananas that have been dried for preservation.

UNSPSC 50331707 Dried organic gros michel bananas is a Commodity code, but the recent solicitations tagged under it reflect no demand for this specific product. The code names a single SKU — dried, organic Gros Michel bananas — yet the source opportunities soliciting under this code are school nutrition programs, correctional facilities, and county procurement offices issuing bids for broad fresh produce baskets, dried fruit assortments, and food service supply contracts. The Hancock County Schools IFB (posted June 10, 2026, due June 26, 2026) covers over 200 fresh produce line items spanning apples, berries, vegetables, citrus, and specialty produce with no mention of dried bananas; the Bridgeport Board of Education commodities procurement (posted June 2, 2026, due June 26, 2026) encompasses eggs, poultry, cheese, beef, and fruit and vegetable products with no dried banana specification; and the Santa Clara County ITB for dried fruits and nuts (posted January 28, 2026, due February 5, 2026) specifies dried raisins, cranberries, tropical fruit mix, walnuts, and pecans but does not list dried bananas. School districts and correctional systems dominate the issuing bodies across recent opportunities—Hancock County Schools, Fairfax County Public Schools, Liberty County Board of Education, Savannah-Chatham County Public School System, Rockwood R-VI School District, and Douglas County School System in Georgia, plus the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. None of these procurement notices request dried organic Gros Michel bananas as a line item or as part of their dried fruit sourcing.

Recent activity clusters in Georgia, Texas, and California, with secondary volume in Virginia, Missouri, and Connecticut. The code shows little relevant recent activity tied to dried organic Gros Michel bananas specifically. When a UNSPSC commodity code is tagged to opportunities that do not solicit the named product, it signals either miscoding by the procuring agency or that the code itself sees minimal state and local demand. Vendors pursuing this code should verify actual procurement intent directly with issuing bodies rather than relying on the code classification to signal active opportunity.