UNSPSC 50331643: Dried organic rival apricots

The variety of organic apricots known as organic rival apricots that have been dried for preservation.

UNSPSC 50331643 Dried organic rival apricots is a Commodity code that does not map to meaningful recent state and local procurement activity. The code nominally describes a single dried-fruit product line, yet the recent opportunities posted under or near this classification span broad fresh and frozen produce categories, proteins, dairy, grains, and prepared foods for school nutrition programs, correctional facilities, and institutional food service. The single dried-fruit procurement that appears in the dataset—Santa Clara County's January 2026 ITB for dried raisins, cranberries, tropical fruit mix, walnuts, and pecans to support the Elmwood Correctional Facility—does not include apricots and represents an isolated, facility-specific buy rather than a systematic or repeated procurement signal under this code.

School districts and county boards of education dominate recent solicitation activity in this code family, posting IFBs and RFPs for master grocery contracts, fresh produce, and comprehensive food supply services across Georgia, Virginia, Missouri, Connecticut, and Texas. Representative opportunities include Hancock County Schools' June 2026 IFB for fresh produce (response due June 26, 2026), Fairfax County Public Schools' April 2026 Master Grocery K-12 IFB (response due April 27, 2026), and the Douglas County School System's Georgia-wide RFP for fresh produce and eggs on behalf of the GEC Buying Cooperative (response due March 4, 2026, with estimated annual spending of $4.4 million for Area One). The Texas Department of Criminal Justice issued a May 2026 IFB for cafeteria food products across five geographic areas and a February 2026 bid for whole dried prunes. State procurement offices in Georgia and broader cooperative purchasing vehicles appear as issuers. However, dried organic apricots specifically do not surface as a line item in any of these solicitations, nor does the code show standalone or repeated buying activity for this single commodity. The mismatch between the code's narrow scope and the breadth of recent solicitations suggests this code may be misapplied or carries minimal independent procurement volume in state and local markets.