UNSPSC 50327012: Dried feijoa

The type of fruit known as feijoa that has been dried for preservation.

UNSPSC 50327012 Dried feijoa is a Commodity code that nominally encompasses specialty dried tropical fruits. However, the recent state and local opportunities tagged under this code show little relevant activity: a single Santa Clara County correctional-facility procurement from January 2026 solicited dried raisins, cranberries, tropical fruit mix, walnuts, and pecans—not feijoa—under an all-or-none five-line-item structure with five-year contract terms and a local business preference. The remaining ten recent opportunities under this code span school nutrition fresh produce, eggs, main-line food distribution, and cafeteria staples across Georgia, Connecticut, Missouri, Texas, Virginia, and California, none of which specifically target dried feijoa. State and local procurement offices do not appear to be actively sourcing dried feijoa as a distinct commodity at this time.

The code shows activity dominated by school districts and county education systems (Hancock County Schools, Bridgeport Board of Education, Fairfax County Public Schools, Rockwood R-VI, Liberty County Board of Education, Savannah-Chatham County Public School System, Douglas County School System), alongside the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Georgia state purchasing, and Santa Clara County corrections. Geographic concentration is strongest in the Southeast—Georgia and South Carolina—followed by the Mid-Atlantic (Connecticut, Virginia) and Texas, with broader multi-state buying through cooperative purchasing vehicles such as the GEC Buying Cooperative serving 30 Georgia school districts. Recent solicitations emphasize firm fixed pricing, Buy American compliance (51 percent domestic content for processed products), HACCP food safety certifications, and annual contract cycles aligned to school fiscal years running July through June. No recent opportunities explicitly target feijoa as a line item, and a business development professional should monitor this code cautiously, as the mismatch between the nominal commodity and actual procurement activity suggests potential taxonomy misclassification by issuing bodies.