UNSPSC 50314522: Organic sensation mangoes

The variety of organic mangoes known as organic sensation mangoes

UNSPSC 50314522 Organic sensation mangoes is a Commodity code. The source shows no recent state or local procurement activity specifically for organic sensation mangoes. The recent opportunities posted under this code involve fresh produce sourcing for school nutrition programs, but they focus on conventional produce staples (apples, bananas, carrots, broccoli, berries, tomatoes, peppers, lettuce, citrus fruits, and eggs) and, in one instance, petite bananas and fresh fruit-and-vegetable snacks for elementary students. None of the posted solicitations name mangoes—organic or conventional—as a line item, and the code's nominal scope does not align with what state and local school districts are actually buying under it in the recent procurement record.

The issuing bodies active in this code tier are school districts and school nutrition programs across Georgia, Florida, Texas, and Wisconsin, including Madison Metropolitan School District, Hancock County Board of Education, Bartow County School System, Bulloch County School District, Liberty County Board of Education, Muscogee County School District, Savannah-Chatham County Public School System, Glynn County Board of Education, McAllen Independent School District, Austin Independent School District, and Douglas County School System via the GEC Buying Cooperative. These jurisdictions solicit fresh produce through RFBs, RFPs, and IFBs with response dates ranging from late March through late July 2026. Representative recent opportunities include Madison Metropolitan School District RFB 4162 for petite bananas (response due July 29, 2026, estimated contract value $78,000), Hancock County Board of Education IFB SN002-2027 for over 200 produce line items (response due June 26, 2026), and the Douglas County School System cooperative procurement for fresh produce and eggs covering 30 districts across two Georgia areas (response due March 4, 2026, estimated annual spending of approximately $5.5 million combined). Geographic activity concentrates in Georgia, with additional recent solicitations in Wisconsin, Florida, and Texas. The mismatch between the code's name and actual procurement activity suggests either a coding error in how state and local purchasing offices tagged these opportunities or a disconnect between the code's intended scope and its current use in the commodity taxonomy.