UNSPSC 50311648: Organic sundrop apricots

The variety of organic apricots known as organic sundrop apricots

UNSPSC 50311648 Organic sundrop apricots is a Commodity code that does not reflect the actual purchasing activity in the recent state and local opportunities tagged under it. The recent solicitations—all from school districts in Georgia and Texas—focus on comprehensive fresh produce procurement for school nutrition programs, including bananas, apples, berries, vegetables, and other commodities, with no specific references to organic sundrop apricots. School districts (including Madison Metropolitan in Wisconsin, Hancock County, Bulloch County, Liberty County, Glynn County, Savannah-Chatham, Muscogee County, and Douglas County in Georgia, as well as Hillsborough County in Florida, Early County in Georgia, McAllen Independent in Texas, and Austin Independent in Texas) dominate the issuing bodies; these are institutional food service procurements, typically structured as sealed bids, RFPs, or IFBs with annual contract terms and delivery to multiple school sites.

The code shows little relevant recent activity tied to organic sundrop apricots specifically. The actual purchasing pattern reflects routine school nutrition procurement across a diverse produce base—fresh fruits, vegetables, and eggs sourced for National School Lunch and Breakfast Programs—with delivery windows typically 6:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. and weekly delivery schedules to multiple locations. Representative recent opportunities include Madison Metropolitan School District's RFB 4162 for petite bananas (due July 29, 2026, estimated $78,000 annual value), Hancock County Board of Education's IFB for over 200 fresh produce line items (sealed bids due June 26, 2026), and the Douglas County School System's RFP SN 26-004 through the GEC Buying Cooperative for fresh produce and eggs across 30 school districts in Georgia (estimated $4.4 million for Area One, proposals due March 4, 2026). Geographic activity concentrates in Georgia and Texas, with secondary activity in Florida and Wisconsin. The mismatch between the nominal code and actual procurement suggests the code either misfires in state and local taxonomies or captures a niche product line that does not surface in current school district procurement notices.