UNSPSC 50307727: Dried cured non-heat sterilized Non-GMO seracena olives

The variety of Non-GMO olives known as organic seracena olives that have been dried cured non-heat sterilized for preservation.

UNSPSC 50307727 Dried cured non-heat sterilized Non-GMO seracena olives is a Commodity code that does not align with the recent state and local solicitations tagged under it. The code shows little relevant activity; the recent opportunities record fresh produce procurement for school nutrition programs and institutional food service (including proteins, vegetables, fruits, dairy, and condiments for school districts, state corrections facilities, and municipal education boards), but none of these solicitations explicitly address dried cured olives or specialty preserved vegetable products as a distinct line item or primary scope. The issuing bodies posting under this code include school districts (Hancock County Board of Education in Georgia, Bridgeport Board of Education in Connecticut), state corrections agencies (Texas Department of Criminal Justice), and state procurement divisions acting on behalf of institutional nutrition programs.

Geographic activity appears concentrated in Georgia, Connecticut, and Texas, based on recent postings. Representative recent opportunities include Hancock County Schools Nutrition Fresh Produce for the 2026–27 school year (IFB #SN002-2027, due June 26, 2026), which solicited over 200 line items of fresh produce across apples, berries, vegetables, and specialty fruit with three delivery locations in central Georgia; the City of Bridgeport, Connecticut's commodity bid (BNB053266, due June 26, 2026) for 115 line items of eggs, poultry, cheese, beef, and fruit and vegetable products to supply the Board of Education Nutrition Center; and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice's cafeteria food products IFB (304T-26-300CF, due May 4, 2026, extended via addendum) covering approximately 382 line items of proteins, frozen entrees, dairy, grains, and condiments across five geographic distribution areas. The mismatch between the code's nominal scope and the actual procurement activity suggests the code may have been applied in error to these nutrition and food service contracts.