UNSPSC 50301566: Pitmaston pineapple apples

The variety of apples known as pitmaston pineapple apples

UNSPSC 50301566 Pitmaston pineapple apples (Commodity) shows minimal recent activity aligned to its nominal scope. The single opportunity explicitly named under this code — a fresh produce RFP issued by Hancock County Board of Education in Georgia in June 2026 — lists Pitmaston pineapple apples among over 200 produce line items spanning multiple apple varieties (Ambrosia, Fuji, Gala, Granny Smith, Honey Crisp, Jazz), berries, cruciferous vegetables, melons, citrus fruits, leafy greens, and specialty produce. However, the vast majority of recent state and local procurement activity tagged to this code or recorded in parallel fresh-produce solicitations does not target Pitmaston pineapple apples as a distinct product line; instead, jurisdictions are sourcing generic fresh produce categories, multi-vendor competitive bids on bulk produce, or produce bundles that do not isolate this specific cultivar.

Recent activity is concentrated in Georgia school districts (Hancock County, Bryan County, Bulloch County, Dougherty County, Liberty County, Glynn County, Muscogee County, Savannah-Chatham County, Henry County) and scattered across Texas (McAllen ISD, Austin ISD), Florida (Hillsborough County), Connecticut (Meriden), Oregon (Central Point), and California (Santa Clara County). Most solicitations are Invitations for Bid (IFB) or Requests for Proposal (RFP) for school nutrition programs under the National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, or USDA Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program, with response deadlines between February and July 2026. The Georgia opportunities dominate the recent pipeline — at least sixteen active or recent solicitations from county school districts and the state itself — but none single out Pitmaston pineapple apples as a line item or specify this variety in evaluation or award terms. The code's assignment to this Hancock County procurement appears to be a categorical tagging artifact rather than a precise match to demand. Vendors pursuing this code should verify sourcing requirements in each RFP or IFB, as most school districts are competing on cost and service capability across broad produce categories rather than cultivar-specific supply commitments.