UNSPSC 42271502: Arterial blood gas monitors

In this classification, this commodity indicates a product that is a customized computer monitor that displays arterial blood gas specific levels. US FDA regulates Arterial blood gas monitors under 21 CFR 868.1150 and under FDA product code CCC. Most nations, for tariff and trade purposes, schedule these products under HS 852849.

UNSPSC 42271502 Arterial blood gas monitors (Commodity) shows minimal recent state and local procurement activity aligned with the code's nominal scope. The five opportunities posted between May and October 2026 include two broad medical-supplies cooperative-purchasing RFPs, two school-district AED solicitations, one county ventilator maintenance contract, one detention-center ERV repair ITB, and one law-enforcement equipment RFP—none of which directly procure arterial blood gas monitors or related diagnostic equipment. The two NASPO ValuePoint master-agreement RFPs (NVP_1443 and RFP 1433, due November 9, 2026) are generic medical-supplies frameworks open to state and local entities across multiple states but do not itemize ABG monitors as a targeted commodity category in the available documentation.

Activity under this code reflects fragmentation across cooperative purchasing vehicles, school districts, and county facilities management rather than coordinated demand for blood gas analysis equipment. The issuing bodies include NASPO ValuePoint (administering across multiple states with Idaho and South Dakota named), Cobb County School District (Georgia), Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners (Florida), the City of Augusta (Georgia), Mt. San Antonio Community College District (California), and Sourcewell (Minnesota-based cooperative). Geographic clustering appears in the Southeast (Georgia, Florida) and the Pacific region, but no state or jurisdiction has posted multiple ABG-specific opportunities. The code shows little relevant recent activity; opportunities tagged to it diverge substantially from arterial blood gas diagnostics and suggest either misclassification in posting systems or a genuine procurement quiet period for this commodity at the state and local level.