UNSPSC 42203501: Cardiac pacemaker generators or cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers CRT-P

In this classification, this commodity indicates a product used as a device used as a generator for either a cardiac pacemaker or a cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers crt-p in a medical setting. Most nations, for tariff and trade purposes, schedule these products under HS 901819.

UNSPSC 42203501 Cardiac pacemaker generators or cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers CRT-P is a Commodity code, but the recent state and local contract opportunities posted under this code show no procurement activity aligned with the code's nominal scope. The three substantive recent solicitations reveal a categorical mismatch: the County of Orange Sheriff-Coroner's IFB for emergency generator service and repairs addresses standby power equipment maintenance across 33 county facilities; Bryan County Board of Commissioners' sealed-bid request covers ten EMS cardiac monitors (diagnostic equipment, not implantable devices); and Sourcewell's law enforcement equipment cooperative purchasing RFP encompasses protective and operational gear for police and sheriff departments. A fourth posting, NASPO ValuePoint's RFP 1433 for medical supplies through a multi-state cooperative vehicle, offers no detail on specific commodity categories or whether cardiac pacemakers are included. None of these opportunities target cardiac pacemaker generators or CRT-P devices—the implantable cardiac rhythm-management systems that the code is designed to classify.

State and local governments soliciting under this code in the recent record include county sheriffs' offices and EMS departments (Bryan County and Orange County, California), cooperative purchasing vehicles administering contracts across multiple states and local entities (NASPO ValuePoint with South Dakota administration, Sourcewell with Minnesota as the host unit), and regional law enforcement consortia. The geographic spread spans California, Georgia, and multi-state cooperative frameworks, though the volume of activity directly relevant to cardiac pacemaker procurement is negligible. The code shows little substantive recent activity and does not reflect genuine state and local procurement in this device category based on available solicitation records.