UNSPSC 42201852: Fluorescent screens

In this classification, this commodity indicates a product used as a fluorescent screen in a pathological procedure in a medical setting. Most nations, for tariff and trade purposes, schedule these products under HS 902290.

UNSPSC 42201852 Fluorescent screens (Commodity) encompasses medical diagnostic imaging equipment and related display systems that state and local healthcare providers and research laboratories are actively acquiring. Recent state and local solicitations show this code capturing point-of-care ultrasound systems with integrated display technology, liquid scintillation counters with spectral analysis capabilities, and associated ancillary equipment. The issuing bodies are primarily healthcare delivery organizations—community health centers, federally qualified health centers, and state research laboratories—rather than traditional state procurement offices or municipalities. Scope includes not only the equipment itself but comprehensive services bundled with procurement: installation, training, EHR and PACS system integration, preventative maintenance, warranty coverage, decommissioning of existing equipment, and cybersecurity compliance documentation.

Geographic activity centers on Texas and Michigan based on recent solicitations. CommUnityCare, a nonprofit community health center serving Travis County, Texas, posted an RFP on June 11, 2026, for point-of-care ultrasound equipment (cart-based and handheld systems with HD displays, advanced imaging modes, DICOM connectivity, and Epic EHR integration) with proposals due June 11, 2026. The Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy posted RFP No. 260000001791 on April 16, 2026, for a Liquid Scintillation Counter replacement with SpectraWorks 2 software, ultralow-level count mode, and associated delivery, installation, training, and decommissioning services, with proposals due May 8, 2026. Both solicitations weighted total cost of ownership, vendor reputation and experience, and technical compliance heavily in evaluation. Neither opportunity carried set-aside designations, though Michigan's RFP noted discretionary preference consideration for qualified disabled or service-disabled veteran-owned businesses under state law.