UNSPSC 42182325: Physiological signal conditioners

In this classification, this commodity indicates a product used as in a medical setting. Most nations, for tariff and trade purposes, schedule these products under HS 901811.

UNSPSC 42182325 Physiological signal conditioners (Commodity) encompasses signal processing and conditioning equipment that state and local procurement offices acquire as components within broader medical supply, public safety, and equipment frameworks. Recent state and local opportunities show limited direct procurement activity focused specifically on physiological signal conditioners as standalone line items; instead, the code appears tagged in cooperative purchasing vehicles and broad equipment solicitations where signal conditioning may be a subordinate component. State agencies, county governments, and local public entities are the primary issuing bodies, often working through cooperative purchasing consortia such as NASPO ValuePoint and Sourcewell to establish multi-year contracting vehicles that serve numerous participating jurisdictions and entity types.

Activity appears concentrated in the western and upper Midwestern United States. The most recent opportunities include NASPO ValuePoint RFP NVP_1443 (posted October 6, 2026, due November 9, 2026) sponsored by Idaho state agencies for medical supplies across multiple product categories through a cooperative purchasing framework, and Sourcewell RFP #061626 (posted May 12, 2026, due June 16, 2026) for law enforcement equipment available to participating entities across Washington state and additional jurisdictions. Both solicitations establish framework agreements rather than transactional purchases, with pricing and terms to be drawn down by individual agencies and departments as needed. The Sourcewell vehicle explicitly spans thousands of governmental agencies, higher education institutions, K-12 school districts, nonprofit organizations, tribal governments, and other public entities, indicating a market structure built around cooperative aggregation rather than direct state-to-vendor engagement. Vendor qualification, pricing competitiveness, and product catalog comprehensiveness drive evaluation; set-asides or state preferences may apply but are not explicitly detailed in available RFP summaries.