UNSPSC 41151712: Carbon monoxide test system

In this classification, a Carbon monoxide test system is a device intended to measure Carbon monoxide for clinical toxicology purposes. US FDA regulates Carbon monoxide test system under 21 CFR 862.3220 and under FDA product code JKT

UNSPSC 41151712 Carbon monoxide test system is a Commodity code, yet the recent state and local opportunities tagged under it show no activity actually purchasing carbon monoxide test systems. The source contains 45 recent solicitations posted between June 26, 2026 and October 23, 2026, spanning Mississippi State University, the University of Southern Mississippi, Midwestern State University, Texas State University, Texas A&M University System, University of Wisconsin-Madison, the University of Mississippi, the State of Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce, Harris County Texas, Escambia County Florida, the Illinois State Police Department, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, the City of Philadelphia, and the State of Oregon. Of these, only two solicitations bear any semantic proximity to test systems: the University of Southern Mississippi's IFB for a Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (DMA) to measure mechanical properties of materials, and Mississippi State University's sole-source notice for an X-Ray Tube and related corrosion inhibitor. Neither procures carbon monoxide detection, measurement, or testing capability. The remaining opportunities span life sciences instrumentation (microscopes, spectrometers, photon detectors, induction furnaces, 3D printers, cold spray systems), environmental monitoring equipment (dilution systems, air samplers, water-quality reagents), scientific research platforms (robotic systems, RF-shielded chambers, high-speed cameras, acoustic telemetry receivers), and miscellaneous capital goods ranging from fire alarm components to football helmets to longleaf pine straw.

The code shows no decision-relevant procurement activity at present. The taxonomy mismatch between the code's nominal scope and the actual solicitations suggests either a data-tagging error or dormant demand for carbon monoxide test systems in state and local procurement. A business development team evaluating this code should treat it as inactive and flag the tagging inconsistency for verification before allocating resources to pursue opportunities under it.