UNSPSC 41103807: Laboratory touch mixers

UNSPSC 41103807 Laboratory touch mixers is a Commodity code, but the recent state and local solicitations tagged under it show a significant scope mismatch. The two recent opportunities include Pinellas County Utilities ITQ 26-0647 (posted June 23, 2026, due June 30, 2026) for Invent Mixer Parts & Accessories to support utility operations across Pinellas County and Clewiston City, Florida, and the City of Palm Bay ITB 19-ITB-26 for comprehensive laboratory testing services across water, wastewater, groundwater, and industrial pretreatment programs. The laboratory testing solicitation encompasses 188 line items with annual estimated quantities ranging from single analyses to 15,000 individual tests, including water testing, wastewater testing, industrial pretreatment analysis, and courier and sampling services—a scope plainly unrelated to laboratory touch mixers themselves. The mixer-parts opportunity is sparse in detail and marked by a compressed six-day proposal window, a reference to an existing blanket purchase agreement, and a Non-Competitive Oversight Committee Justification Form suggesting potential limited competition or sole-source positioning.

Recent activity centers on Florida utilities and municipalities. Pinellas County Utilities and the City of Palm Bay represent the jurisdictions with posted opportunities, though the laboratory testing procurement is the more substantial scope, requiring NELAP-accredited laboratories with Florida Department of Health Environmental Laboratory Certification and a minimum five years' experience serving municipal utilities, with historical annual spending of $66,360 (2024) and $95,440 (2025). The mixer-parts solicitation remains the only recent activity directly aligned with the code's nominal scope, but the posting is recent and the opportunity window tight, making responsiveness and prior relationship with Pinellas County utilities operations material to pursuit. The code shows limited recent activity overall, and the laboratory testing opportunity appears to have been mistagged under the laboratory mixer category rather than reflecting actual laboratory equipment procurement.