UNSPSC 39111626: Floodlight

Flood lights are used to flood an area with light. It is the best way to provide an enormous amount of non-natural light to an area.

UNSPSC 39111626 Floodlight is a Commodity code that covers specialized lighting fixtures and equipment for outdoor illumination, though recent state and local procurement activity under this code does not align closely with the nominal scope. The only substantive solicitation tracked under the code is Ocean County, New Jersey's Request for Quotations (PTPQ202604) for Drone Light Display Services posted in July 2026, which seeks drone-based aerial light shows rather than traditional ground-mounted floodlights. The vast majority of recent opportunities identified in the category—including helicopter tugs, boarding bridges, aircraft ramp equipment, hangar door repairs, traffic signal installations, bus wash systems, weather observation systems, and airport access control—fall outside floodlight scope entirely, suggesting either significant miscoding at the source or limited current demand for floodlight procurement through formal state and local channels. Issuing bodies across the recent opportunity set span airport authorities, county transportation departments, municipal aviation divisions, and state transportation cabinets, primarily across Florida, Kentucky, Texas, New Jersey, and New Mexico, though these represent miscoded or unrelated procurements rather than actual floodlight activity.

The single on-topic solicitation—Ocean County's drone light display request with a due date of April 7, 2026—represents emerging technology procurement rather than conventional lighting infrastructure. No other recent state or local opportunities demonstrably procure floodlights or related lighting commodities. The code shows minimal relevant recent activity for business development purposes; firms should verify current UNSPSC tagging at source procurement systems before allocating pursuit resources under this category, as the mismatch between code definition and actual buying patterns suggests either temporary catalog drift or systematic miscoding that may resolve as jurisdictions refine their taxonomy usage.