UNSPSC 24102302: Wire guided automatic guided vehicle

A type of Automatic Guided Vehicle, or AGV consisting of a computer controlled wheel based load carrier that runs on the plant floor in a defined path defined by buried wires.

UNSPSC 24102302 Wire guided automatic guided vehicle is a Commodity code that does not reflect what state and local governments actually buy under this designation. The recent opportunities tagged with this code show virtually no procurement activity for wire-guided AGVs; instead, the solicitations span traffic signal infrastructure, communications equipment, roadway construction, conveyor systems for educational facilities, and office supplies—none of which align with the code's nominal product scope. The code shows little relevant recent activity for vendors targeting state and local markets in automated guided vehicle systems.

Across the most recent opportunities in the block, issuing bodies include cities (Brownsville, Dallas, Fort Worth, Olathe, Round Rock, Richardson, Detroit, Brownsville), counties (Cameron, Pasco, Bergen, Harris), a state agency (Oklahoma), a special-purpose district (Purchasing Cooperative of America), and a regional authority (Atlanta BeltLine). Geographic spread spans Texas heavily (Brownsville, Dallas, Fort Worth, Round Rock, Harris County, Richardson, Olathe, Kansas, and Florida (Pasco County, Broward County, Detroit, Michigan, Oklahoma, Colorado (Boulder County), Georgia (Atlanta), New Jersey (Bergen County), Mississippi (DeSoto County), and the District of Columbia. Representative recent opportunities include the City of Brownsville's IFB for 12th Street Traffic Signal Improvements (due May 26, 2026), Harris County's ITB for Fry Road traffic signal installation and modifications (due April 6, 2026), and Bergen County's sealed bid for traffic signal repair parts under a cooperative purchasing framework (due February 27, 2026). The substantial mismatch between the code definition and actual procurements suggests the code was applied in error or that the database tagging is inconsistent with procurement intent.