UNSPSC 10232026: Live magnet pompon chrysanthemum

Live plant including the root ball of the magnet variety of pompon chrysanthemum flowers

UNSPSC 10232026 Live magnet pompon chrysanthemum is a Commodity code that shows minimal alignment between its nominal scope and recent state and local procurement activity. The recent opportunities tagged under this code involve landscape installation, coastal dune restoration, environmental planting and maintenance services, and generic plant procurement—none of which are specific to live magnet pompon chrysanthemums. The City of Dallas issued an Informal Solicitation (IFS) in January 2026 for the Purchase of Plants with bids due February 3, 2026, requiring new, unopened items FOB delivery to Dallas with firm pricing for thirty days and a one-year warranty. Pasco County Board of County Commissioners posted an Invitation for Bid (IFB) in March 2026 for landscape and irrigation installation along Ridge Road, including installation of trees, shrubs, palms, and groundcover species meeting Florida Department of Agriculture Grade Number 1 standards, with bids due April 14, 2026, at $120,000 total contract price. Collier County, Florida, solicited bids via Quick Quote for supply and installation of native dune plants—sea oats, railroad vine, sea purslane, and dune sunflower—across approximately 225,000 square feet of coastal dune in March 2026, with responses due March 13, 2026. Pinellas County issued a Request for Proposal in February 2026 for Environmental Planting, Monitoring, Reporting and Maintenance Services from 2025 to 2030, encompassing invasive plant removal, native plant installation, and ecological restoration at wetlands and stormwater sites, with proposals due July 29, 2025.

The code displays activity concentrated in Florida counties—Pasco, Collier, and Pinellas—and the City of Dallas, with issuing bodies ranging from city procurement departments to county commissioners' offices. The work being solicited reflects landscape beautification, coastal environmental restoration, and ecological mitigation rather than the specific ornamental flower variety the code nominally describes. No repeat buyers appear across the recent opportunities, and no dollar values, set-asides, or vendor names are identified beyond the issuing agencies themselves. The mismatch between the code's name and the actual scope of procurement suggests this code may not be the appropriate classification for tracking live chrysanthemum purchases in state and local markets, or that the tagging reflects administrative classification variance rather than commodity-specific demand.