UNSPSC 10214828: Live tardiva hydrangea

Live plant including the root ball of the tardiva variety of hydrangeas

UNSPSC 10214828 Live tardiva hydrangea (Commodity) does not map to the state and local procurement activity captured in the recent-opportunities block. The source records five recent solicitations across Florida, Georgia, and Texas that span IT infrastructure installation, roadside landscaping and irrigation, coastal dune restoration planting, environmental wetland management and monitoring, and general plant procurement—none of which center on live tardiva hydrangea as a discrete product line. The code's nominal scope (a single ornamental plant species) is substantially narrower than the actual work being bought under this code tag, which encompasses broad environmental planting, restoration, landscaping design-build, and procurement of mixed native and ornamental plant materials.

The issuing bodies are geographically dispersed county governments and municipalities: DeKalb County (Georgia), Pasco County Board of County Commissioners (Florida), Collier County (Florida), Pinellas County (Florida), and the City of Dallas (Texas). Recent opportunities include DeKalb County's ITB for IT and low-voltage infrastructure at the reconstructed DeKalb Tennis Center (due July 13, 2026); Pasco County's IFB for 2.95 miles of landscaping and irrigation installation on Ridge Road, budgeted at $120,000 (due April 14, 2026); Collier County's informal Quick Quote for coastal dune stabilization planting of 56,250 native plants across 225,000 square feet (due March 13, 2026); Pinellas County's RFP for five-year environmental planting, invasive removal, and monitoring services covering mitigation sites and wetlands (due July 29, 2025, with a five-year contract term and SBE participation threshold of $100,000); and the City of Dallas's informal solicitation for general plant purchase with FOB delivery (due February 3, 2026). The code shows little relevant recent activity focused on live tardiva hydrangea as a commodity; practitioners should verify whether the code assignment reflects actual procurement intent or a data-entry error in the source system.