UNSPSC 10161557: Chestnut tree

Tree of the fagaceae family. Around 20-30 meters in height with a trunk measuring 2 m in diameter. Produces brownish color chestnuts

UNSPSC 10161557 Chestnut tree, a Commodity code, does not align with the state and local procurement activity currently tagged under it. The code's nominal scope is a single tree species; however, the most recent opportunities solicited under this code involve diverse tree planting, landscape installation, and grounds maintenance services across multiple tree species, not chestnut procurement specifically. Harris County issued an ITB for supply of various trees and related items (due September 28, 2026), and the City of Arlington, Texas solicited an RFP for monthly grounds mowing and maintenance of city-owned properties (due October 1, 2026), neither of which targets chestnut trees as a distinct commodity. The mismatch between the code's narrow scope and the actual work being bought suggests this code sees limited relevant recent activity for chestnut procurement itself.

The recent opportunities that carry this code assignment span municipal tree planting and landscape services across Texas, Wisconsin, Maryland, Georgia, and Florida. The City of Fitchburg, Wisconsin issued an ITB for the 2026 Fall Tree Planting Project (due August 25, 2026), encompassing furnishing and planting of 66 trees across 17 species with one-year guarantee and contractor-funded replacement of failed plantings; Hillsborough County, Florida solicited bids for Tree Replanting of Scenic Roads and Miscellaneous Areas (ITB 26-00257, due May 26, 2026) with a contract estimate of $742,380.00; and the Town of Palm Beach, Florida requested bids for furnishing and installation of Royal Palm and Green Malayan Coconut Palm trees along Peruvian Avenue (ITB 2026-036, due May 29, 2026). The Maryland Environmental Service issued an RFP for urban tree planting funded by a Climate Pollution Reduction Grant with a 10% MBE participation goal (due July 16, 2026). Issuing bodies include county commissioners, city procurement offices, and state environmental agencies; repeat solicitation patterns favor county and municipal parks and grounds departments. The geographic spread reflects sporadic activity across the Southeast and Midwest, with no clear concentration in a single state or region.