New Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity Contract (s) for Architect/Engineering Services for Quality Assurance/Peer Reviews
This is a SOURCES SOUGHT SYNOPSIS. No proposals are being requested or accepted with this synopsis. The purpose of this sources sought synopsis is to determine the availability of qualified contractors to perform these services to include Certified Small Businesses, 8(a) contractors, HUBZone Certified Small Business Concerns, and Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Louisville District Contracting Division is seeking information regarding capability and availability of potential contractors to perform a variety of Architect-Engineer services primarily to perform independent quality assurance reviews of designs prepared by other Architect-Engineer firms for compliance to DoD and other Federal design law, policy and guidance. Projects outside the primary mission area and for other missions may be added at the Government's discretion upon agreement of the A-E firm.
The intent is to award a minimum of four (4) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts with a single five (5) year base. The contracts will have a shared capacity of $15,000,000.00 over the life of the contracts. The primary North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code applicable to these requirements is 541330, Engineering Services.. The Small Business Size Standard is $16,500,000.00. All interested Small Businesses, certified HUBZONE, 8A, Woman-Owned Small Businesses or Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business contractors should respond to this survey by email on 10 January 2020 by 10:00 AM Eastern Time.
Once selected, the following factors will be used in deciding which selected firm will be utilized for firm-fixed price task orders: (1) Professional qualifications necessary for satisfactory performance of required services; (2) Specialized experience and technical competence in the type of work required; (3) Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time; (4) Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules; (5) Knowledge of the locality of the project; (6) Other appropriate evaluation criteria specific to the task order requirement. Multiple task orders may be awarded with similar completion schedules and overlapping delivery dates.
The selected offerors will be solely responsible for the quality and completeness of reviews required by each individual task order on the contract. Projects may consist of reviews of planning, design, and related products for military and other customers of USACE Louisville District. Project task orders under this contract may include review of facility designs for new construction, partial renovation or full renovation of some or all of the following types of building structures: Army Reserve training centers (which include administration, education, assembly, storage, special training and other support spaces); vehicle maintenance shops (which include work bays, administration, special training, storage and support spaces); stand-alone buildings (which include administration facilities, unheated storage, and direct support/general support warehouses); research laboratories; intelligence production complexes; command and control facilities; airfields; airfield operations facilities; training ranges; other facilities unique to military installations; clinics and medical facilities for the military and Department of Veterans Affairs; and other federal facilities.
It is anticipated that A/E services as a part of this requirement may consist of QA review, peer review, or forensic reviews of:
Construction solicitations for design-bid-build (complete design) projects and design build RFP’s (request for proposal);
Concept level designs and engineering feasibility studies;
Military master planning;
Site investigation/assessment of existing conditions;
Value engineering services;
Engineering services during construction (shop drawing review, site inspection, etc);
Design of demolition or deconstruction; hazardous materials survey, analysis, and abatement methodology; LEED Certification, sustainable design;
Construction cost estimates and schedules;
Technical studies/analysis in support of design for new construction and renovation;
Comprehensive planning that is related to future construction requirements on military installations; coordination and attainment of local, state and federal permits;
Support and coordination in the development of utility agreements; and utility investigations.
Responses to this notice shall include:
Offeror's name, address(es), point of contact, phone number, and e-mail address.
Offeror's capability based on the specialized experience and technical competencies below.
Design of military construction projects per Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC), the Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS) and other applicable Military and Federal design and construction criteria
Use and understanding of Design/Build project design methodology per Engineering Reregulation ER-1180-1-9 and the Louisville District Military Design Guide to include the Army Reserve Design Process and Submittal Requirements
Use and understanding of USACE Life-safety Review procedures per the Louisville District Design Guide to include the Fire Protection/Life Safety/Accessibility Code Review Checklist
Use and understanding of UFC 1-200-02, UFC 3-210-10, sustainable design and low impact development
Use and understanding of UFC 3-410-01 and HVAC design for military construction projects
Use and understanding of UFC 3-600-01 and fire protection design for military construction projects
Use and understanding of UFC 4-010-01 and design of anti-terrorism and force protection measures
Use and understanding of UFC 4-171-05 and design of Army Reserve Facilities
Use and understanding of AFRCH32-1001 Air Force Reserve Command Standard Facility Requirements
Use and understanding of Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) Number 705 and design of secure areas/facilities
Use and understanding of the Louisville District Design Military Guide to include the Army Reserve Design Process and Submittal Requirements
Use and understanding of UFGS specs, SpecsIntact and Louisville District specific specifications
Experience with CyberSecurity and Risk Management Framework (RMF) Process
Forensic testing and analysis for mold and mold mitigation (Environmental)
Forensic inspection and analysis of design and construction deficiencies identified during construction
Ability to review design features unique to localities nation-wide (like soil characteristics, seismic requirements, climate factors, etc.)
Use and understanding of the ProjNet suite of online systems to include DrChecks and Bidder Inquiry
Offeror's Personnel to be utilized for Technical Reviewers/Quality Assurance Reviewers/Peer Reviews. These personnel must possess the certifications and registrations listed below and must have experience in the listed role for the amount of time below as a registered professional.
Review Project Manager, Registered Architect or Professional Engineer, 5 Years
Indicate years of experience leading multidisciplinary teams (Architect, Civil/Site, Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing and Structural) in vertical construction projects.
Architect Design Reviewer, Registered Architect, 15 Years
Architect Design Reviewer, Registered Architect, 5 Years
Civil Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 15 Years
Civil Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 5 Years
Structural Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 15 Years
Structural Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 5 Years
Mechanical Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 15 Years
Mechanical Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 5 Years
Electrical Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 15 Years
Electrical Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 5 Years
Geotechnical Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 15 Years
Geotechnical Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 5 Years
Interior Design Reviewer, Registered Interior Designer, 10 years
Environmental Engineer Design Reviewer, No certification required, 10 years
Include experience related to analysis of mold surveys and mold mitigations plan.
Communication Distribution Design Reviewer, Registered Communications Distributions Designer, 10 years
Landscape Architecture Design Reviewer, Registered Landscape Architect, 10 years
Fire Protection Design Reviewer, Registered Fire Protection Engineer, 15 years
Fire Protection Design Reviewer, Registered Fire Protection Engineer, 5 years
Commissioning Reviewer, 10 years a NEBB qualified Systems Commissioning Administrator (SCA); ACG Certified Commissioning Authority (CxA); ICB/TABB Certified Commissioning Supervisor; BCA Certified Commissioning Professional (CCP); AEE Certified Building Commissioning Professional (CBCP); University of Wisconsin-Madison Qualified Commissioning Process Provider (QCxP)
NOTE: Total submittal package shall be no longer than 25 pages, no smaller than 11 font. Please only include a narrative of the requested information; additional information will not be reviewed.
Email responses to Josh Westgate at Joshua.K.Westgate@usace.army.mil. This is NOT a Request for Proposal and does not constitute any commitment by the Government. Responses to this sources sought notice will be used by the Government to make appropriate acquisition decisions. All interested sources must respond to future solicitation announcements separately from responses to this market survey.
**************************************************************************
All contractors must be registered in the System for Award Management (www.SAM.gov) to do work with the government. An active SAM registration isn't required to submit on this market survey. Those not currently registered can obtain registration by going to the website http://www.SAM.gov and are highly encouraged to begin the registration process. The process can usually be completed from 24 to 48 hours after submission. Contractors will need to obtain a Unique Entity Identifier (formerly DUNS number) for processing their registration. If you do not already have a Unique Entity Identifier, one can be obtained from http://www.SAM.gov. Refer to www.SAM.gov for information formerly found in CCR, EPLS, ORCA and FedReg.
ALERT: You must submit a notarized letter appointing the authorized Entity Administrator before your registration will be activated. This requirement now applies to both new and existing entities. Effective 29 April 2018, the notarized letter process is now mandatory on all CURRENT registrants at SAM who have a requirement to update data on their SAM record. The notarized letter is mandatory and is required before the GSA Federal Service Desk (FSD) will activate the entity's registration. Effective 29 June 2018, vendors creating or updating their registration can have their registration activated prior to the approval of the required notarized letter. However, the signed copy of the notarized letter must be sent to the GSA Federal Service Desk (FSD) within 30 days of activation or the vendor risks no longer being active in SAM.
PLEASE NOTE: SAM is completely free of charge for both registrants and users. An active SAM registration is not required to submit on the market survey.
Interested Offerors shall respond to this Sources Sought Synopsis no later 10 January 2020 by 10:00 AM Eastern time. ALL RESPONSES MUST BE EMAILED to Josh Westgate, Contract Specialist at: Joshua.K.Westgate@usace.army.mil. This Sources Sought Synopsis is not to be construed as a commitment by the Government, nor will the Government pay for the information solicited. All interested sources must respond to future solicitation announcements separately from the responses to this market survey.
W912QR20RQAPR Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Louisville
12/20/19, 12:58 PM New Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity Contract (s) for Architect/Engineering Services for Quality Assurance/Peer Reviews
SYNOPSIS: This announcement is open to all businesses regardless of size. The NAICS code for this procurement is 541330. The proposed services, which will be obtained by negotiated Firm Fixed Price Contracts, are for a variety of Architect-Engineer services primarily to perform independent quality assurance reviews of designs prepared by other Architect-Engineer firms for compliance to DoD and other Federal design law, policy and guidance. Projects outside the primary mission area and for other missions may be added at the Government's discretion upon agreement of the A-E firm. Awards will be made as Firm-Fixed Price Task Orders during the period of performance. The total shared contract capacity for this contract is valued at $15,000,000 over a five year period. This is a five year contract, with no option years. The expected construction cost of projects designed as a part of this contract is between approximately $3,000,000 and $500,000,000. There is no limit on the value of individual task orders. Work will be issued by negotiated firm-fixed-price task orders. The period of performance for task orders issued under these contracts may extend beyond the five year ordering period.
Three (3) to five (5) firms will be selected to be a part of a multiple award task order contract with the shared capacity mentioned above. Once selected, the following factors will be used in deciding which selected firm will be utilized for task orders: (1) Professional qualifications necessary for satisfactory performance of required services; (2) Specialized experience and technical competence in the type of work required, including, where appropriate, experience in energy conservation, pollution prevention, waste reduction, and the use of recovered materials; (3) Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time; (4) Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules; (5) Knowledge of the locality of the project; (6) Other appropriate evaluation criteria specific to the task order requirement. Multiple task orders may be awarded with similar completion schedules and overlapping delivery dates. Estimated start date is July 2020.
As a contract specifically procured by the Louisville District, the selected firms and relevant sub-consultants will be required to attend an annual two-day partnering workshop in Louisville, KY for the life of the contract. This workshop will require the attendance of representatives from the selected firms to define the Government's expectations, create a positive working atmosphere, encourage open communication, and to identify common goals. Cost for these sessions will be borne by the selected firms.
In accordance with FAR 36.604 and the supplements thereto, and upon final acceptance or termination, all task orders above $35,000 will receive a performance evaluation. A performance evaluation may be prepared for lesser task orders and interim performance evaluations may be prepared at any time. Performance evaluations will be maintained for use in future source selections for Architect-Engineer Services.
2.) PROJECT INFORMATION:
The selected offerors will be solely responsible for the quality and completeness of reviews required by each individual task order on the contract. Projects may consist of reviews of planning, design, and related products for military and other customers of USACE Louisville District. Project task orders under this contract may include review of facility designs for new construction, partial renovation, or full renovation of some or all of the following types of building structures: Army Reserve training centers (which include administration, education, assembly, storage, special training, and other support spaces); vehicle maintenance shops (which include work bays, administration, special training, storage, and support spaces); stand-alone buildings (which include administration facilities, unheated storage, and direct support/general support warehouses); research laboratories; intelligence production complexes; command and control facilities; airfields; airfield operations facilities; training ranges; other facilities unique to military installations; clinics and medical facilities for the military and Department of Veterans Affairs; and other federal facilities.
A/E services may consist of the following activities: QA review, peer review or forensic review of construction solicitations for design-bid-build (complete design) projects and design-build RFPs (request for proposal); concept level designs and engineering feasibility studies; military master planning; site investigation/assessment of existing conditions; value engineering services; engineering services during construction (shop drawing review, site inspection, etc.); design of demolition or deconstruction; hazardous materials survey, analysis, and abatement methodology; LEED Certification, sustainable design; construction cost estimates and schedules; technical studies/analysis in support of design for new construction and renovation; comprehensive planning that is related to future construction requirements on military installations; coordination and attainment of local, state and federal permits; support and coordination in the development of utility agreements; and utility investigations
Additional A/E support services may include: review of geotechnical studies; interior design services; environmental compliance; National Environmental Policy Act documentation; controlled waste and flammable storage design; and asbestos, lead and PCB surveys and/or abatement. Other A/E services beyond traditional design may include: site selection; American Land Title Association surveys; deed and title services; DD form 1391 development; facility assessments; updating the Army Reserve Design Criteria; and development of standard designs and value engineering workshops.
Project-specific requirements will be described in each individual task order’s Statement of Work.
3.) SELECTION CRITERIA: Selection criteria in descending order of importance are listed below. Paragraph 3(a) through Paragraph 3(d) are primary, and Paragraph 3(e) is secondary.
Professional Qualifications:
The government’s evaluation of professional qualifications will consider education, training, certifications, registrations, overall experience, relevant experience, and longevity with the firm. Only SF330 Section E and Section F will be used to evaluate the offerors’ professional qualifications.
The government will also consider prior teaming experience between multiple designers included in Section E working on the same project in their proposed role and included in SF330 Section G.
Specialized Experience and Technical Competence:
The government’s evaluation of Specialized Experience and Technical Competency will consider example projects in SF330 Section F that demonstrate the Specialized Experience and Technical Competencies below. The government’s evaluation will also consider how the these same Specialized Experience and Technical Competencies are demonstrated in the individual team members’ resumes in the SF330 Section E, for the individuals as indicated below in parentheses.
Design of military construction projects per Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC), the Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS), and other applicable Military and Federal design and construction criteria (All individuals included in in Section E)
Use and understanding of Design/Build project design methodology per Engineering Reregulation ER-1180-1-9 and the Louisville District Design Guide, to include the Army Reserve Design Process and Submittal Requirements (Review Project Manager, Architecture, Mechanical, Electrical, Structural, Interior Design and Civil)
Use and understanding of USACE Life-safety Review procedures per the Louisville District Design Guide, to include the Fire Protection/Life Safety/Accessibility Code Review Checklist (Review Project Manager, Architecture, Mechanical, Electrical, Structural, Interior Design and Civil)
Use and understanding of UFC 1-200-02 and sustainable design (Architecture, Mechanical, Electrical, Structural, Interior Design and Civil)
Use and understanding of UFC 3-410-01 and HVAC design for military construction projects (Architecture, Mechanical, Electrical and Fire Protection)
Use and understanding of UFC 3-600-01 and fire protection design for military construction projects (Architecture, Mechanical, Electrical and Fire Protection)
Use and understanding of UFC 4-010-01 and design of anti-terrorism and force protection measures (Architecture, Mechanical, Electrical, Structural, Interior and Civil)
Use and understanding of UFC 4-171-05 and design of Army Reserve Facilities (Architecture, Mechanical, Electrical, Structural, Interior and Civil)
Use and understanding of Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) Number 705 and design of secure areas/facilities areas (Architecture, Mechanical, Electrical and RCDD)
Use and understanding of the Louisville District Design Guide, to include the Army Reserve Design Process and Submittal Requirements (Architecture, Mechanical, Electrical, Structural, Interior and Civil)
Use of SpecsIntact (Architecture, Mechanical, Electrical, Structural, Interior Design and Civil)
Experience with CyberSecurity and Risk Management Framework (RMF) Process (RCDD, Electrical)
Forensic testing and analysis for mold and mold mitigation (Environmental)
Forensic inspection and analysis of design and construction deficiencies identified during construction (All Disciplines)
Use and understanding of Prevention through Design (PtD) per the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
The DQMP included in Section H will also be considered when evaluating Specialized Experience and Technical Competency of the offeror.
Capacity:
The government’s evaluation of the offeror’s capacity narrative and associated tables, figures, etc. included in SF330 Section H will consider the offeror’s ability to complete the work in the required time, with the understanding that this contract may require multiple design teams to work multiple task orders at various locations simultaneously.
Past Performance:
The government’s evaluation of past performance will consider (1) the performance evaluations provided in Section H for the projects in Section F and (2) any performance evaluations in ACASS/CPARS for the DUNS numbers of any firms or offices listed in the SF330 or for any of the projects included in Section F. Performance evaluations completed by the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) or equivalent role on the contract are preferred. While all performance evaluations may be considered, those for projects listed in Section F and projects with similar scopes of work will receive the most consideration when evaluating past performance.
Small Business Participation:
The government’s evaluation of the offeror’s Small Business Participation plan will consider level of participation of Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Woman-Owned Small Business, HUBZone Small Business, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business and Veteran Owned Small Business team members.
4.) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Offerors must submit one (1) hard copy and one (1) electronic copy on CD of the SF 330, Part l, and one copy of the SF330, Part II for the prime firm. Each branch office that will have a key role in the proposed contract must also submit a copy of the SF 330 Part II. Offerors must submit a current and accurate SF330, Part II, for each proposed sub-consultant. Any firm with an electronic mailbox responding to the solicitation should identify such address in the SF 330, Part I. Please identify the Dun & Bradstreet number of the office(s) performing the work in Block 5 of the SF 330, Part I. Dun & Bradstreet numbers may be obtained by contacting (866) 705-5711, or via the internet at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform.
The proposal shall be submitted as one file using Adobe Acrobat (.pdf). Font size shall be 10 or larger on white letter-sized paper (8½ inches by 11 inches). The SF330 will be no longer than 100 pages in length (excluding the SF330, Part IIs). Resumes in Section E can be no more than 2 pages in length, and individual projects in Section F can be no more than 2 pages in length. Section H shall be 20 pages or less in length and may only include information specifically required by this presolicitation to be in Section H. All government evaluation of proposals associated with the selection criteria in Paragraph 3(a) and 3(b) will be performed using Section E, Section F, Section G, and Section H as indicated in Paragraph 3. Any additional information included in the proposal not specifically required may not be evaluated or considered. Each printed side of a page will count as one page. The data on the CD shall not substitute for the hard copy submission. Dividers, bindings and cover sheets do not count against the total page count of the response to the RFP
Do not furnish design portfolios, prints, magazines, newspaper clippings, or CDs of completed projects. All requirements of this notice must be met for a firm to be considered responsive.
Additional instructions and clarifications for SF330:
SF330 Section D:
The offerors shall submit an organizational chart as required by SF330 Section D. Offerors may submit a folded 11”x 17” organizational chart as part of their submission. This will be considered only one page of their submission.
SF330 Section E:
The individuals identified by the project roles on the SF330 may not have multiple duties or be “dual-hatted.” Offerors shall provide individual resumes in SF330 Section E for each of the individuals listed below in lines 1 thru 20. Individuals included in SF330 Section E must possess the certifications and registrations listed below and must have design or review experience on projects similar to those listed in Paragraph 2 of this solicitation for the amount of time listed below as a registered professional. Proposals that strongly demonstrate, in lieu of just listing, the specialized experience and technical competence included in Paragraph 3(b) will be evaluated more favorably.
Review Project Manager Registered Architect or Professional Engineer, 5 Years
Indicate years of experience leading multidisciplinary teams (Architect, Civil/Site, Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Structural) in vertical construction projects
Architect Design Reviewer, Registered Architect, 15 Years
Architect Design Reviewer, Registered Architect, 5 Years
Civil Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 15 Years
Civil Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 5 Years
Structural Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 15 Years
Structural Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 5 Years
Mechanical Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 15 Years
Mechanical Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 5 Years
Electrical Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 15 Years
Electrical Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 5 Years
Geotechnical Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 15 Years
Geotechnical Engineer Design Reviewer, Registered Professional Engineer, 5 Years
Interior Design Reviewer, registered interior designer, 10 years
Environmental Engineer Design Reviewer, No certification required, 10 years
Additional consideration will be given for experience related to analysis of mold surveys and mold mitigations plan.
Communication Distribution Design Reviewer, RCDD, 10 years
Landscape Architecture Design Reviewer, Registered Landscape Architect, 10 years
Fire Protection Design Reviewer, Registered Fire Protection Engineer, 15 years
Fire Protection Design Reviewer, Registered Fire Protection Engineer, 5 years
Commissioning Reviewer, 10 years a NEBB qualified Systems Commissioning Administrator (SCA); ACG Certified Commissioning Authority (CxA); ICB/TABB Certified Commissioning Supervisor; BCA Certified Commissioning Professional (CCP); AEE Certified Building Commissioning Professional (CBCP); University of Wisconsin-Madison Qualified Commissioning Process Provider (QCxP)
SF330 Section F:
Projects included in SF330 Section F will be considered more relevant if construction is substantially complete, and projects that achieved substantial completion more recently will be considered more relevant. Substantially complete is defined as a construction project when the project and/or facility can be used for its intended purpose. Of the up to ten projects included in SF330 Section F, a minimum two of the projects must be design/build request for proposal preparation by the offeror and minimum of two must be fully designed by the offeror. Base MATOC or IDIQ contract awards may not be used as projects, only individual task orders that resulted in actual design effort from these base MATOC and IDIQ contracts may be used. For all projects included in Section F, the offeror must indicate what percentage by dollar value of the overall work was self-performed by the team being submitted as a part of this SF330. This percentage shall only include the work that was performed by individuals who were employed by the firms listed in this SF330, even if the work was performed as a part of a joint-venture or a team of A-E contractors.
SF330 Section H:
In SF330 Section H, include an evaluation of performance from the client/owner for all example projects included in SF330 Section F. Performance evaluations will not be counted against the 20 page limit of SF330 Section H or the 100 page limit for the entire SF330.
In SF330 Section H, each offeror shall produce a detailed Design Quality Management Plan including the following items:
An explanation of the firm's management approach
Management of sub-consultants (if applicable)
Procedures for reviewing design features unique to localities nation-wide (e.g., soil conditions, seismic requirements, climate factors, etc.)
Risk management and mitigation processes as well as procedures to ensure that internal resources are not over committed
A narrative explaining of the chain of command to include individuals that will serve as the single point of contact for the contract and other senior leaders which are responsible to ensure successful execution of task orders
An organizational chart showing the inter-relationship of management and various team components (including sub-consultants).
Section H shall also include a Capacity Narrative and associated tables, figures, etc. showing the offeror’s ability to complete the work with available resources and available ramp-up capacity with numerous high-quality design teams.
In SF330 Section H, the offerors may receive additional consideration for the successful execution of IDIQ contracts. For each IDIQ included, the offeror shall provide the contract and task order number (if applicable), the total contract capacity and capacity used, number of task orders, performance evaluation ratings for task orders (ratings only, not entire evaluation), team members noted in Section E that were legal designers of record or checkers for task orders, and team members that were responsible for the overall management of the IDIQ.
In SF330 Section H, all large businesses shall present a Small Business and Small Disadvantaged Business Subcontracting Plan in accordance with Public Law 95-507 as part of the response to this RFP. The number of pages of the Small Business Small Disadvantaged Business Plan do not count against the total page count for the response to the RFP. Additionally, estimate the proposed extent of participation of Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Woman-Owned Small Business, HUBZone Small Business, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, and Veteran Owned Small Business team members in the contract team using a chart showing each firm that is a team member, their small business category, and their proposed level of participation measured as a percentage of the overall estimated effort (i.e., a chart with 3 columns, respectively entitled 'Firm Name', 'Small Business Category', and '% Participation').
Release of firm status will occur within 10 days after approval of any selection. All responses on SF330 to this announcement must be received no later than 1:00 p.m. local time on 31 March 2020. No other general notification to firms under consideration for this project will be made. Facsimile transmissions will not be accepted. Solicitation packages are not provided and no additional project information will be given to firms during the announcement period.
To be eligible for award, a firm must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database, via the SAM Internet site at https://www.sam.gov.
Submit responses to US Army Corps of Engineers, Louisville District, ATTN: Josh Westgate; 600 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Pl., Room 821, Louisville, KY 40202.
Contracting Office Address:
USACE District, Louisville, 600 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Place, Room 821, Louisville, KY 40202
Place of Performance:
USACE District, Louisville, 600 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Place, Room 821, Louisville, KY 40202
Point of Contact(s):
Josh Westgate 502-315-6207; Joshua.K.Westgate@usace.army.mil
USACE District, Louisville
W912QR20R0042 Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Louisville
2/27/20, 3:00 PM