Project Grant 2411609

Award Date 12/1/23
Completion Date 6/30/25
Dollars Obligated $283K
Federal Grant Program
47.075
Assistance Type
Project Grant
Place of Performance
Springfield, OR 97477, USA
Similar Awards
This National Science Foundation (NSF) Division of Social and Economic Science Project Grant, titled "Coping with Compounding Risk and Uncertainty: A Longitudinal Study of Cascading Collective Stress in a Probability-Based-US Sample," is being awarded to the University of California Irvine (UC Irvine) for $1,018,693.00. The project commenced on June 15, 2023 and will run until May 31, 2026. The primary objectives of this study are to: (1) examine how exposure to compounding...
The National Science Foundation (NSF) awarded a $217,772 Project Grant through the Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (CFDA 47.075) program to the University of Alabama, effective July 1, 2024. This 3-year research project aims to investigate how individuals process information and make decisions when faced with prospects characterized by multiple layers of risk and/or ambiguity, such as those related to climate change or public health emergencies. The project will outline a series of...
This Project Grant award of $190,321 from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (CFDA 47.075) program supports research to advance modeling and analysis of risks in complex technological systems. The project aims to (A) enhance modeling of potential risks by integrating knowledge from risk science, engineering, organizational and social sciences, (B) apply new risk analysis methods across diverse industry and regulatory settings, and (C) develop an...
This Project Grant award from the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (CFDA 47.075) program provides $181,696 to the University of Wyoming to conduct a survey experiment investigating the public's perception and support for wildfire risk reduction policies. The research aims to examine how recent wildfire exposure affects people's understanding of the benefits of proactive forest management, their preferences for investing in prevention versus...
This Project Grant award from the National Science Foundation (NSF) under the Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (CFDA 47.075) program provides $167,929 to the Oregon Research Institute (ORI) to conduct research on public perceptions of global catastrophic risks and human extinction. The project aims to systematically identify U.S. public views on risks such as super-volcanoes, pandemics, nuclear war, and artificial intelligence that could potentially lead to human extinction. It will...
This federal Project Grant award from the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Engineering program (CFDA 47.041) provides $549,953 to The Research Foundation for the State University of New York (RF-SUNY) to support research on understanding and predicting decision-making among vulnerable populations, such as older adults, during disasters. The research will utilize virtual reality (VR) experiments to examine differences in risk perception and protective action decisions across various natural...
This National Science Foundation (NSF) Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (CFDA 47.075) Project Grant award of $150,000 will fund research to develop improved measures of systemic cyber risk in the financial sector. The project aims to separately measure systemic risk and cyber risk, then combine them to examine key research questions about systemic cyber risk. The research will leverage comprehensive data on firms and technologies from the Spiceworks Company Intelligence Database to...
This National Science Foundation (NSF) Project Grant award under the Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences program (CFDA 47.075) in the amount of $200,282 provides funding to North Carolina State University to conduct research on understanding and overcoming impediments to high-risk, high-return science. The researchers will develop and analyze mathematical models to examine how scientists balance competing incentives and constraints when pursuing their research programs, with a focus on...
The National Science Foundation (NSF) awarded a $207,842 Project Grant under the Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (CFDA 47.075) program to the University of Oregon (UO). The grant, with a project period from June 1, 2024 to May 31, 2027, will fund research to investigate effective methods for communicating quantifiable health risks to the public in order to increase comprehension and promote healthy behaviors. The project will develop a theory-based taxonomy of risk communication...
This National Science Foundation (NSF) Project Grant award under the Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (CFDA 47.075) program provides $299,271 to Lehigh University to develop a novel, human-centered, multi-scale, multi-agent system-of-systems (MSASOS) modeling framework for comprehensive flood risk management. The key products/services include: Establishing a comprehensive US-Japan flood risk data inventory, with a focus on data related to marginalized groups Developing the MSASOS...

INTEGRATING RISK PERCEPTION MEASURES, ANTECEDENTS, AND OUTCOMES -RISK PERCEPTION HAS BEEN CENTRAL TO RISK ANALYSIS SINCE IT BEGAN, BUT HOW WE DEFINE AND MEASURE ?RISK PERCEPTION? CAN GREATLY AFFECT SCHOLARS? GRASP OF ITS SOURCES OR OUTCOMES. UNFORTUNATELY, USE OF RISK PERCEPTION MEASURES HAS BEEN UNSYSTEMATIC, WITHIN AND ACROSS MULTIPLE FIELDS (E.G., HEALTH BEHAVIOR). STRIKINGLY, FOUR CRITICAL TOPICS?HOW TO MEASURE RISK PERCEPTION; HOW RISK PERCEPTION SHAPES OUTCOMES SUCH AS BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS AND POLICY SUPPORT; AND SOURCES OF RISK PERCEPTIONS?USUALLY ARE STUDIED SEPARATELY, DESPITE OBVIOUS MUTUAL IMPLICATIONS: E.G., WHETHER AND HOW RISK PERCEPTIONS ARE AFFECTED BY, OR AFFECT, OTHER VARIABLES MIGHT DEPEND ON HOW THEY ARE MEASURED. MOST QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH ON THESE TOPICS HAS USED CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY DESIGNS, INADEQUATE TO TEST MOST CRITICAL HYPOTHESES. TEMPORAL CHANGES ARE BETTER TESTED WITH LONGITUDINAL PANEL DESIGNS, BUT EVEN WHEN (RARELY) USED, FAR MORE ATTENTION IS PAID TO THE OBSERVED SIGN OF THE ASSOCIATION THAN TO WHETHER ITS MAGNITUDE OR SIGN VARIES OVER TIME. WE ALSO KNOW LITTLE ABOUT WHETHER OR HOW THESE ASSOCIATIONS VARY ACROSS HAZARDS. BY MORE SYSTEMATICALLY ASSESSING ASSOCIATIONS ACROSS MULTIPLE PERCEPTION MEASURES, HAZARDS, AND TIME, THE FINDINGS ABOUT SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES CAN IMPROVE RISK COMMUNICATION AND RISK MANAGEMENT EFFORTS. THESE IMPROVEMENTS WILL REDUCE HARMS TO HUMANS AND WHAT THEY VALUE. THE PROPOSED RESEARCH USES FOCUS GROUPS AND U.S. NATIONALLY REPRESENTATIVE CROSS-SECTIONAL AND LONGITUDINAL PANEL SURVEYS. THIS FIRST SYSTEMATIC ATTEMPT TO SIMULTANEOUSLY MODEL RISK PERCEPTION MEASURES, ANTECEDENTS, AND OUTCOMES (BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS, POLICY SUPPORT) OFFERS A CHANCE TO INTEGRATE A FIELD SPLINTERED ACROSS THESE FOUR RELATED TOPICS AND MULTIPLE SCHOLARLY DISCIPLINES. THIS EFFORT AIMS TO PROVIDE A FOUNDATION THAT CAN BE EXTENDED TO BOTH SPECIFIC FIELDS AND TOPIC AREAS, AND POTENTIALLY TO OTHER SOCIETIES BEYOND THE U.S. DATA GENERATED IN THIS RESEARCH PROJECT. THE NEW KNOWLEDGE IS ABOUT THE DEGREE TO WHICH RISK PERCEPTION PATTERNS GENERALIZE ACROSS HUMANS AND SITUATIONS. THIS AWARD REFLECTS NSF'S STATUTORY MISSION AND HAS BEEN DEEMED WORTHY OF SUPPORT THROUGH EVALUATION USING THE FOUNDATION'S INTELLECTUAL MERIT AND BROADER IMPACTS REVIEW CRITERIA.- SUBAWARDS ARE NOT PLANNED FOR THIS AWARD.

Posted 1/16/24, 12:00 AM