David archer concludes the global carbon cycle by saying: "the conclusion we come to is that the natural carbon cycle is a wild card, as large an uncertainty as that of our own CO2 emissions." (the…

Ended Grant For Research Awarded

Contract number
80NSSC19K0175
Awardee
Awarding agency
Obligated
$50,035

Award facts

Contract value 100% obligated
$50,035.00 Current and potential, with all options
Completion date 100% complete
Current and potential, with all options
NAICS code
Not on record
PSC
AR21 R&D- Space: Science/Applications (Basic Research)
Set-aside
No set-aside
Competition
Not Competed Basic Research
Pricing
Other
Place of performance
Washington, DC 20036, USA

Award details come from SAM.gov/FPDS.

Description

David archer concludes the global carbon cycle by saying: "the conclusion we come to is that the natural carbon cycle is a wild card, as large an uncertainty as that of our own CO2 emissions." (the global carbon cycle, princeton, 2010, P20). Uncertainties in emissions figure prominently in modeling the social cost of carbon (SCC), but the uncertainties from the carbon cycle have so far played no role in the models underpinning the SCC. Neglecting uncertainty quantification (UQ) for the carbon cycle poses a risk for decision making. IT also makes quantifying the social benefit of programs aimed at reducing that uncertainty impossible. Bontempi, cetinic and cooke began laying the foundations for a value of information study of the carbon cycle in 2018. An abstract the economic valuation of aquatic carbon observations from space was submitted to the oceanobvs 19 conference and the authors were invited to submit a community white paper to be published in a special issue of frontiers in marine science prior to the conference. The envisioned VOI study is similar in spirit to studies conducted by cooke ET AL with researchers at the langley center. However, those VOI studies could profit from a baseline uncertainty quantification of equilibrium climate sensitivity and an existing uncertainty decomposition of the climate observing system clarreo. These could be plugged into the integrated assessment model dice with relative ease to put a dollar value on enhanced observation capabilities. A comparable baseline uncertainty quantification of the carbon cycle is not available, in part because the carbon cycle itself can be presented at varying levels of complexity according to the purpose for which IT is used. Flaws in the carbon cycle in dice are widely recognized, but no alternative at a comparable level of complexity is at hand, and even this model is not equipped with UQ. For the frontiers paper, a simple carbon cycle with UQ of some pedigree can be extracted from ipcc AR(5) to provide a baseline UQ and illustrate the impact of these uncertainties on atmospheric concentrations of CO2. Coupling this with the damage and economic impacts modules of dice will allow US to compute the expected surfeit averted damages of any observation program whose uncertainty reduction can be quantified. The rest of this proposal describes initial steps already performed and sketches work yet to be performed for the frontiers white paper.

Quick answers

Who was awarded contract 80NSSC19K0175?

80NSSC19K0175 was awarded to Resources For Future Inc. by Shared Services Center (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) on December 18, 2018.

How much is contract 80NSSC19K0175 worth?

The government has obligated $50,035 on 80NSSC19K0175.

Was contract 80NSSC19K0175 competed?

The extent of competition for 80NSSC19K0175 was not competed.

On GovTribe

See this award's full record

  • Every transaction and funding action
  • The awardee's other awards and teaming partners
  • Similar awards and recompete opportunities
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this award