100%
Skip to main content
Platform
GovTribe AI
AI-powered insights to accelerate your government contracting workflow.
MCP Server
Connect GovTribe to your AI tools.
Beacon
Find and connect with key government decision-makers.
Profiles
Federal Agencies
Federal Contract Vehicles
Federal Grant Programs
Major Defense Acquisition Programs
NAICS Categories
PSC Categories
States
Jurisdictions
NIGP Categories
UNSPSC Categories
Vendors
Enrichment By Clearbit
Reports
New Entrants
Funding Analysis
Vehicle Analysis
Groups
Capture
Pipelines
Pursuits
Alerts
Teaming
Data
Awards
Forecasts
Federal Opportunities
State & Local Opportunities
Files
Prime and Subcontractors
Activity
Search
Exports
Solutions
Use Case
Opportunity Identification
Capture Management
Competitive Intelligence
Teaming & Partner Identification
Proposal Management
Strategic Leadership
Go-to-Market Strategy
Industry
Federal Contractors
State & Local Contractors
Grant Seekers
Government Agencies
Research & Consulting
Pricing
More
About Us
Features
Get A Demo
Sign Up
Blog
User Guide
Data Model
GovTribe for Agents
Login
Contact sales
Try for free
Login
Contact sales
Try for free
All Federal Contract Awards
Delivery Order W9128F11D0002-CL01
Award Date
6/13/11
Potential Completion Date
3/31/13
Potential Value
$3.6M
Overview
Contacts
Activity
5
Transactions
5
Subawards
Opportunity Stack
Similar Awards
Federal Agency
ENDIST Little Rock
Awardee
Pond & Company JWVMACEAWBN4
Ultimate Awardee
Not listed
NAICS Category
541330 - Engineering Services
PSC Category
C219 - Architect And Engineering- General: Other
Federal Contract Vehicle
Not listed
Set-Aside Type
No Set-Aside Used
Extent Competed
Full and Open Competition
Major Defense Program
Not listed
Pricing Type
Firm Fixed Price
Place of Performance
LR AFB, AR 72099, USA
Solicitation Procedures
Architect-Engineer FAR 6.102
Number Of Offers Received
24
Legislative Mandate
Not listed
National Interest Action
Not listed
Research Type
Not listed
Primary Consortia Member
Not listed
W9128F11D0002
Indefinite Delivery Contract
W9128F11D0002-CL01
Delivery Order
Update #1
Update #2
BASE BID & OPTION YEAR 1
Posted 6/14/11
5
1
Name
Description
Solicitation Number
FederalAgency
Type
PostedDate
Airfield and Roadway Design CONUS and OCONUS UNRESTRICTED WORLDWIDE
Added: Jul 07, 2009 2:39 pm Solicitation AnnouncementCONUS and OCONUSUNRESTRICTED WORLDWIDE ForAirfield and Roadway Design THIS IS AN A-E ANNOUNCEMENT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE PREPARED OR PROVIDED. Solicitation W9128F-09-R-0066 is UNRESTRICTED, worldwide, open to both large and small businesses under NAICS Code 541330. To be considered a small business, a firm must have a size standard of $4.5 Million Dollars gross annual receipts over 3 years. The Government intends, after successful negotiations with the most qualified firms, to award a contract for performing airfield obstruction surveys of military and civil works/commercial airfields at locations toughout CONUS (Continental United States) and OCONUS (Outside the Continental United States). Firms responding to this announcement must be able to pass all security checks, have proper insurance and meet all other regulatory requirements necessary to gain access to military installations. Work under a resultant contract from this announcement will include designing airfield pavement, lighting and NAVIDS systems at military and civil works/commercial airfields including topographic surveys and geotechnical laboratory investigations. Vertical construction related to the design of control tower, hangars, bridges etc will be required. Contractors are required to have experience with Department of Defense Unified Facilities Criteria. Delivery orders will be issued tough out the contract period as work is required under this contract and may include services in conjunction outlined below: The Six (6) selection criteria listed immediately below are in descending order of importance. Offerors should submit and demonstrate the following areas of expertise and capabilities to be evaluated as part of the selection process: (1) Contractor shall submit a minimum of 4 examples of airfield designs done within the last 6 years that demonstrate the specialized experience and technical competence of the firm (including consultants) in: (a) Design of new airfield pavements including the use of DOD pavement design software (PCASE), (b) Knowledge of Army and Air Force airfield and air space criteria (UFC 3-260-01, 3-260-02 found at http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/browse) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards, (c) Design and evaluation of airfield repair and maintenance projects, (d) Design of new roadway pavement and bridges. (e) Design of electronic NAVAIDS and airfield lighting (UFC 3-535-01) (f) Nondestructive testing/evaluation of existing pavements, (g) Field and laboratory testing of existing pavement and proposed paving materials, (h) Design of aircraft hangar and airfield control towers, (i) Comprehensive knowledge of DOD material specifications for asphalt and concrete, (j) Producing (CADD) drawings fully compatible with the most recent version of one of either Micro Station or Auto CADD and contract specifications with SPECINTACT software. (k) Experience in creating design-build Request for Proposal documents, (l) Construction cost estimating and preparation of estimates using Micro Computer Aided Cost Estimating System (M-CASES) Gold version or similar system (M-CASES Gold software will be provided). (2) Professional qualifications and specialized experience resumes, in providing services similar to those listed above, of the proposed team members (including any or all consultants) in the following disciplines: Project Manager, Civil Engineer with emphasis in Airfield Engineering, Construction Pavement Engineer Geotechnical Engineer, Materials Engineer,Structural Engineer,Mechanical EngineerArchitect,Soil/Paving Laboratory Technician, Electrical Engineer (NAVAIDS i.e. ILS, PAR, etc. and aviation lighting) Estimator, Clerical, CADD Operator, (3) Design Management Plan (DMP). The DMP should be brief and include an explanation of the firms management approach, management of subcontractors (if applicable), specific quality control procedures used and an organizational chart showing the inter-relationships of management and various team components (including subcontractors). (4) Capacity to accomplish a major project within 4 months, including the ability to complete more than one work order at a time. (5) Past performance on contracts with respect to cost control, quality of work and compliance with performance schedules. (6) Volume of Department of Defense (DOD) contract awards it has received and has active actions on in the last twelve months.The following evaluation criteria will be used to evaluate offerors documentation submitted: Exceptional The offer exceeds the scope of the announcement requirements in the majority of the aspects of the particular factor. The offer also provides advantages and exceeds the announcement requirements in performance or capability indicating maximum benefit to the Government. The factor has no weaknesses or omissions. Above Average The offer exceeds the scope of the announcement requirements in many aspects of the particular factor. The offer provides advantages in key areas or exceeds announcement requirements in performance or capability indicating significant benefit to the Government. The factor may contain weaknesses or omissions that have no impact on the offer as a whole. Average The offer matches the scope of the announcement requirements of the particular factor. There may be strengths but them may not aggregate into an advantage indicating additional benefit to the Government or may be offset by weaknesses. Marginal The offer matches some but not all of the announcement requirements of the particular factor. There may be limited or individual requirements of the particular factor. There may be limited or individual strengths but they do not aggregate into an advantage and are offset by weaknesses, significant weaknesses, deficiencies or omissions. The Government may still receive benefit from the offer submitted. Unacceptable The offer fails to meet a majority of announcement requirements or has omitted critical information required to evaluate the factor. There are no strengths. The offer contains a large number of highly significant weaknesses, significant weaknesses, omissions and/or deficiencies. For the factors any omissions or failure to match the announcement requirements will be evaluated as unacceptable.Upon completion of evaluation of the SF 330 offers received, a short list of most qualified firms will be determined. Until selection is completed, there will be no notification of any type to firms either on the short list or not who submitted information for consideration. Once the short list is approved by the Source Selection Authority, those firms that did not make the short list will be promptly notified.There will be up to two (2) contracts awarded as a result of negotiations. Each contract will have a period of performance consisting of a two year base period and a $4 million capacity with an option to extend the contract to 5 years with a maximum capacity of the $9 Million Dollars. No one single task order issued against a contract will exceed $2 Million Dollars. The Government reserves the right to, at any time, exercise the option of a contract if the capacity for that contract period has been exhausted tough issuance of task orders or modifications to task orders.Firms having capabilities for this work and desiring consideration for selection are invited to submit a completed SF-330 identifying personnel and equipment owned by the firm including but not limited to resumes of the disciplines listed above and other key personnel. Offering firms should have sufficient workforce personnel, including consultants or sub consultants, with technical competence and expertise to perform the work without assigning or reassigning a significantly large portion of their resources to a project. Completed SF 330 information must reach the Contracting Division Offices no later than Close of Business (COB) 30 July 2009. COB is considered 4:30 PM CST (Omaha Time). All questions concerning the above requirements should be sent by email to John.D.Denning@usace.army.mil or call (402) 995-2053. Send offers to: U.S. Army Engineer District, Omaha, (CENWO-CT-M, Denning) 1616 Capitol Avenue, Omaha, NE 68102-4901. Mark offers with the announcement number W9128F-09-R-0066, submittal date, 30 July 2009 and add a line stating 'Offer, Announcement W9128F-09-R-0066, to be opened by Contracting Division personnel ONLY'.
W9128F09R0066
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Omaha
Award Notice 1/3
7/7/09, 2:39 PM
Award Notice
Added: Dec 17, 2010 10:40 am IDIQ for Airfield and Roadway Design and Evaluation, CONUS an OCONUS
W9128F-09-R-0066
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Omaha
Award Notice 3/3
12/17/10, 10:40 AM
Award Notice
Added: Nov 16, 2010 8:25 am IDIQ for Airfield and Roadway Design and Evaluation, CONUS and OCONUS
W9128F-09-R-0066
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Omaha
Award Notice 2/3
11/16/10, 8:25 AM
5
1
Mod #
Description
ReasonForModification
Federal Obligation
Date
4
MODIFICATION TO EXTEND DELIVERY PERIOD UNTIL 31 MAR 2013
Other Administrative Action
$0
1/31/13
3
BASE BID - EXTEND DELIVERY PERIOD UNTIL 31 JAN 2013
Other Administrative Action
$0
8/22/12
2
OPTION YEAR 1
Other Administrative Action
$1.4m
8/22/11
1
BASE BID - MOD TO CORRECT DELIVERY DATE
Other Administrative Action
$0
6/15/11
Not listed
BASE BID & OPTION YEAR 1
Not listed
$2.2m
6/14/11