Asbestos analytical methods have evolved over a number of years, utilizing available understanding of the nature of the asbestos fiber and how best to visually identify them. Currently used analytical…

Ended Awarded Last action

Contract number
0008
Awardee
Awarding agency
Obligated
$223,389

Award facts

Contract value 100% obligated
$223,389.16 Current and potential, with all options
Completion date 100% complete
Current and potential, with all options
Funding agency
Office of Research and Development Headquarters Offices, Environmental Protection Agency
Set-aside
No set-aside
Competition
Full and Open Competition · 1 offer Multiple Award, Fair Opportunity
Pricing
Cost Plus Fixed Fee
Place of performance
Cincinnati, OH 45212, USA

Award details come from SAM.gov/FPDS.

Transactions

Action Obligated Date
Supplemental Agreement for work within scope 2 · Comparison of asbestos analytical methods -$300,172
Additional Work (new agreement, FAR part 6 applies) 1 $124,156
Original award $399,405

Description

Asbestos analytical methods have evolved over a number of years, utilizing available understanding of the nature of the asbestos fiber and how best to visually identify them. Currently used analytical methods for asbestos air filter samples include phase contrast microscopy (PCM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). There are also TEM methods that count fibers of dimensions equivalent to those that would be counted under the PCM method called PCM-equivalent, or pcme. Under contract EP-c-05-060, task order #101, the usepa conducted a comparison of various asbestos analytical methods under two different loading conditions; (200 structres per square millimeter (STR/MM2) and 1000 STR/MM2 and three asbestos types; libby amphibole, amosite, chrysotile. This task order will utilize the results of the task order # 101 study to expand the understanding of how different conditions affect asbestos analysis. The purpose of this task order is to compare the results of the asbestos analytical methods listed above across multiple laboratories on air filter samples generated under different loading conditions. This project will be conducted in stages. Each stage will consist of loading and testing 10 batches of 80 filters each. The results of previous analyses will be used to guide the next stage to be conducted. The usepa desires to conduct up to five stages, with each stage scheduled to take a calendar year. As a result, the project is scheduled to last up to five (5) years. This is an applied research/technology evaluation project subject to nrmrl category 3 quality assurance requirements.

Quick answers

Who was awarded contract 0008?

0008 was awarded to Research Triangle Institute by Cincinnati Procurement Operations Division (Office of Acquisition Management) on July 26, 2012.

How much is contract 0008 worth?

The government has obligated $223,389 on 0008.

Which agency awarded contract 0008?

Cincinnati Procurement Operations Division (Office of Acquisition Management) awarded 0008, with funding from Office of Research and Development (Headquarters Offices).

Is contract 0008 an order under another contract?

Yes. 0008 is a delivery order under EPC11036, an indefinite delivery contract, on Scientific, Technical, Research, Engineering, and Modeling Support 2 (STREAMS 2).

Was contract 0008 competed?

The extent of competition for 0008 was full and open competition. The government received 1 offer.

On GovTribe

See this award's full record

  • Every transaction and funding action
  • The awardee's other awards and teaming partners
  • Similar awards and recompete opportunities
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this award