Attachment 2 - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.pdf

PDF 226 KB Posted

Attached to
FRP MATOC Midwest Region W912DY-20-R-0068 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W912DY20R0068
Issued by
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering Support Center Huntsville

About this file

This document contains a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan and details for a Facilities Reduction Program Multiple Award Task Order Contract solicitation. The Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan outlines performance standards for key contract deliverables such as submitting 90% of required project documents and reports on time with less than 10% requiring revisions. It details methods for government monitoring including inspection of documents, work processes, and deliverables. It also establishes incentives for meeting standards such as higher contractor ratings and potential termination for failure to meet standards.

The Facilities Reduction Program MATOC solicitation is to provide demolition and abatement services for excess federal facilities throughout parts of the Midwest region. General work includes planning, coordination, and execution of building and facility removal along with emergency response services. The North American Industry Classification code is 238910. The solicitation is issued by the Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering Support Center Huntsville to support streamlined excess facility removal processes.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to FRP MATOC Midwest Region W912DY-20-R-0068, newest first.
File Type Posted
W912DY-20-R-0068 CONFORMED COPY 18 Aug.pdf PDF
Attachment 18 Estimated Quantities Rev 03 18 Aug.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 18 - Estimated Quantities Rev 02.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W912DY-20-R-0068 Amendment 0004 18 Aug.pdf PDF
CONFORMED COPY W912DY20R0068.pdf PDF
W912DY-20-R-0068 0003.pdf PDF
Attachment 18 - Estimated Quantities Rev 01.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 19 - ProjNet Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
W912DY-20-R-0068 0002.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Experience Reporting Form Rev 01.pdf PDF
Attachment 17 Sample Task Order Attachment B Rev 01.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FRP Region 3 W912DY20R0068 ProjNet Questions 3 August Revised.pdf PDF
Attachment 12 - Demolition and Recycling Final Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Small Business Participation Commitment.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Experience Reporting Form.pdf PDF
Attachment 17 - Sample Task Order Attachment B.XLSX XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 4- Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment 18 - Estimated Quantities.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 10 Accident Prevention Plan Checklist.pdf PDF
Attachment 13 Specification Guide 02220 Demolition.pdf PDF
Attachment 15 - Descriptive Data for ECPs and REAs.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Performance Requirements Summary.pdf PDF
W912DY20R0068 0001 conform.pdf PDF
W912DY20R0068 0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - FRP Small Business Decision Matrix.pdf PDF
Attachment 14 Specification Guide 02221 ExBackSite.pdf PDF
Attachment 16 - Sample Task Order.pdf PDF
Attachment 9 Work Plans Sub-Plans and Appendices.pdf PDF
Attachment 6- Letter of Commitment (Key Subcontractor).pdf PDF
Attachment 11 - Safety and Health Program Requirements.pdf PDF
A.07.23 FY20 FRP MW Region MATOC Combined Synopsis.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - FRP Small Business Decision Matrix.pdf PDF
Attachment 16 - Sample Taks Order.pdf PDF
Attachment 6- Letter of Commitment ( Key Subcontractor).pdf PDF
Attachment 9 Work Plans SubPlans and Appendices.pdf PDF
Attachment 14 Specification Guide 02221 ExBackSite.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Performance Requirements Summary.pdf PDF
Attachment 17 - Sample Task Order Attachment B.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 13 Specification Guide 02220 Demolition.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Small Business Commitment Document.pdf PDF
Attachment 12 - Demolition and Recycling Final Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 4- Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment 10 - Accident Prevention Plan Checklist.pdf PDF
Attachment 15 - Descriptive Data for ECPs and REAs.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment 11 - Safety and Health Program Requirements.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Monthly Progress Report Format.pdf PDF
W912DY20R0068.pdf PDF
Attachment 18 - Estimated Quantities.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 3 - Experience Reporting Form.pdf PDF
Show all 50

FRP MATOC Midwest Region W912DY-20-R-0068 has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 2 – Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

1. Performance Requirements Summary

The table on the following page lists the PWS requirements/deliverables that the Government shall monitor. The absence of any contract requirement from the PRS/QASP must not detract from its enforceability nor limit the rights or remedies of the Government under any other provision of the contract, including the clauses entitled “Inspection of Services” and “Default.” The table defines the standard for each listed PWS service, cites the respective specification, provides the method of surveillance, and describes disincentives for not meeting acceptable standards.

2. Government Quality Assurance

The Contracting Officer (CO) has overall responsibility for overseeing the Contractor’s performance. The CO shall monitor day-to-day contract compliance and administration. The

COR shall assist the CO with their duties and is responsible of technical administration of the project. The COR also assures proper Government surveillance of the Contractor’s performance and shall monitor, record, and report on the technical performance of the Contractor on a day-today basis. The COR, along with USACE subject matter experts, shall assure the Contractor is meeting contract PWS standards, as well as all Federal, state, and local regulatory requirements.

The Government intends to use the following methods to monitor standards:

Inspection and review of all required documents and submittals.

Periodic inspection of work processes or output.

100% inspection at the completion of key work segments and deliverables.

Customer feedback.

3. Performance Evaluation

The Government shall evaluate Contractor performance to determine if its performance meets the requirements of the contract. The COR shall evaluate and report Contractor performance to the

Contracting Officer at each milestone and delivery per the project schedule. Contractor shall submit progress inspection reports as required. When the performance requirement is not met, the

Contracting Officer shall issue a contract discrepancy report (CDR) to the Contractor. The

Contractor must respond to the CDR and return it to the contracting officer within five (5) calendar days of receipt. Failure to meet acceptable performance standards may result in one or all of the following actions:

Temporary work stoppage awaiting corrective action.

Withdrawal of work

Terminate the task order.

Terminate the MATOC (basic) contract.

Required Service Paragraph

Number

Standard Method of

Surveillance

Incentive/Disincentive

Preparation and submittal of required project documents, forms, permit requests, and notifications.

6.5 Contractor shall

submit 90% of reports on time, with less than

10% requiring more than one revision.

100% inspection

CPARS Rating:

Exceptional = 100% of reports on time requiring zero revisions.

Unsatisfactory = less than 80% of reports on time and/or more that

20% requiring more than two revisions.

Submittals that do not meet acceptable performance standards may be rejected in whole or in part.

Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination

Mobilization/demobil ization and work site setup, to include protection of personnel, xxx, land, and water resources.

6.5.3 Accomplish 90%

of mobilization/de mobilization tasks within timeframe allotted in project schedule

Periodic progress inspection

CPARS Rating:

Exceptional = 100% of project milestones completed by

Contractor within project milestone schedule.

Unsatisfactory = less than <80% of project milestones completed by Contractor within project milestone schedule.

Failure to perform work according to project execution schedule could result in assessment of liquidated damages for schedule delays, and may result in the issuance of show cause and/or possible contract termination.

Removal, capping, rerouting of all affected utilities

6.5.5 Meets site-

specific utility owner standard

Periodic progress inspection

Failure to correctly perform this service may disrupt installation utility services and negatively impact operations. Such an incident could result in assessment of liquidated damages for outages, and may result in the issuance of show cause and/or possible contract termination.

Abatement of

ACM/ORM

6.5.6, 6.5.7 No exceptions to reported

ACM/ORM

removal

100% inspection

Failure to perform this service in compliance with Federal, State, and local environmental, health, and safety regulations, will result in a less than satisfactory CPARS rating and/or a stop work order. Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination for cause.

Demolition performed in accordance with accepted work plan

6.5.9 100% work required by PWS

100% inspection

Failure to perform this service in compliance with Federal, State, and local environmental, health, and safety regulations, will result in a less than satisfactory CPARS rating and/or a stop work order. Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination for cause.

Debris disposal, diversion, and recycling

6.5.10 Meets material

handling and disposal requirements based on waste stream characterization

Periodic progress inspection

Failure to perform this service in compliance with Federal, State, and local environmental, health, and safety regulations, will result in a less than satisfactory CPARS rating and/or a stop work order. Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination for cause.

Site Restoration 6.5.11 Meets requirements of

PWS and

SWPPP.

100% inspection

Failure to perform this service in compliance with Federal, State, and local environmental, health, and safety regulations, will result in a less than satisfactory CPARS rating and/or a stop work order. Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination for cause.

Recurring

Deliverables/Submitt als

(daily/weekly/monthl y)

6.5.12 Contractor shall

submit 90% of reports on time, with less than

10% requiring more than one revision.

100% inspection

CPARS Rating:

Exceptional = 100% of reports on time requiring zero revisions.

Unsatisfactory = less than 80% of reports on time and/or more that

20% requiring more than two revisions.

Submittals that do not meet acceptable performance standards may be rejected in whole or in part.

Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .