Attachment_0014_-_Cost_Narrative_2017-11-16_(OMD).docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) V Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W52P1J-16-R-0001
About this file
This document contains a cost narrative template for a federal contract opportunity and details of the related Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) V solicitation. The cost narrative template outlines required cost categories including labor, non-labor expenses, overhead rates, compliance, and other items to fully explain an offeror's proposed costs.
The LOGCAP V solicitation will be issued on November 6, 2017 seeking proposals for logistical support services worldwide to support U.S. military operations. The services include supply, transportation, engineering, base camp management, and other logistics functions. The Army intends to award a minimum of four and up to six Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity contracts for an initial five-year period plus five one-year options. A "Setting the Theater" task order for each Geographic Combatant Command will be awarded initially along with other known requirements, with periods of performance of one base year plus nine one-year options for "Setting the Theater" and one base year plus four one-year options for others. The total maximum value is $82 billion over ten years. Proposals will be evaluated on technical, past performance, small business participation, and cost/price factors.
Attachment 0014_-_Cost_Narrative_2017-11-16_(OMD).docx
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (LOGCAP) V has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
COST NARRATIVE
The cost narrative(s) should address the following, as applicable:
1. Identification of the Defense Contract Audit Agency and Defense Contract Management Agency offices and points of contact if known (include name, address, phone number, and e-mail address) having cognizance over the offeror’s proposal.
2. Information on cost accounting standards (CAS) compliance:
a. Whether your organization is subject to cost accounting standards.
b. Whether your organization has submitted a CASB Disclosure Statement, and if it has been determined adequate.
c. Whether you have been notified that you are or may be in noncompliance with your Disclosure Statement or CAS (other than a noncompliance that the cognizant Federal agency official has determined to have an immaterial cost impact), and, if yes, an explanation.
d. Whether any aspect of this proposal is inconsistent with your disclosed practices or applicable CAS, and, if so, an explanation.
e. Whether the proposal is consistent with your established estimating and accounting principles and procedures and FAR Part 31, Cost Principles, and, if not, an explanation.
3. Identify all proposal assumptions and rationale. Assumptions that alter or supplant terms or conditions contained in this solicitation, as amended, may result in the Offeror’s proposal being rejected and the Offeror being removed from consideration.
4. Labor: Discuss the following using text and figures:
a. Development of annual productive hours for personnel. Account for and explain the difference between available and productive hours. Include a discussion on the standard work week proposed. If different productive hours are proposed for different PWS paragraphs or types/categories of personnel, each should be discussed.
b. Development of annual non-productive hours for personnel. If the offeror charges non-productive hours as a direct charge, identify the components that make up the non-productive hours (e.g., R&R, holidays, leave, etc.). Nonproductive hours are defined as hours expended for non-work time such as vacation, holiday, sick leave, and other personal leave. Explain how the annual non-productive hours per person were estimated. If different non-productive hours are proposed for different PWS paragraphs or types/categories of personnel, each should be discussed.
c. Basis for labor rates.
d. Identification of all proposed compensation beyond basic pay, such as uplifts (whether based on offeror policy or Department of State uplifts), overtime premiums, pay differentials (e.g., swing, evening), bonuses, R&R, allowances, etc., the basis for them, and how they are calculated. The identification of such compensation should be consistent with the descriptions used in the contractor’s cost proposal. The discussion should identify when, and under what circumstances, each type of compensation is applicable (e.g., overtime is applied to all hours exceeding X hours per week). The discussion should separately address the applicability of such compensation to productive and non-productive hours. If no additional compensation is proposed, indicate as such.
e. Discuss the offeror’s R&R policy. The discussion should address the following:
(1) Number of R&R trips proposed each year per employee.
(2) Total number of days away from theater per trip, including separate identification of paid and unpaid days per trip, and the number of paid hours per trip.
(3) Identification of any allowances proposed per trip, such as airfare tickets, and the amount of such allowances.
5. Defense Base Act (DBA) Insurance: Address whether DBA insurance costs for subcontractor personnel is included in the subcontract cost, or as part of the offeror’s own cost.
6. Due to the complexity of many formulas (particularly those containing numerous conditional statements), explain how uplift and indirect rates (including direct labor overhead, fringes, G&A, etc.) are calculated. This explanation should refer to specific column headers used in the offeror’s detailed supporting schedules. For example, an explanation that states a rate is applied to “payroll” is not clear if there is no column or name in the “Labor Details” supporting schedule labeled “Payroll”. In this case, the offeror should identify what columns constitute “payroll”.
7. If a factor is being applied to any cost and the factor reduces the cost, the factor should be explained. Failure to do so may result in an upward most probable cost adjustment to the offeror’s proposed costs. The offeror should provide support showing the realism of the factor.
8. Address any escalation proposed.
9. Non-fee bearing costs: Provide an affirmative statement that the offeror and its subcontractors have complied with the requirements of Section H.2 of this solicitation, and identify the types of costs for which fee has not been applied.
10. A statement addressing the offeror’s obligations under FAR Clause 52.215-22 – Limitation on Pass-Through Charges – Identification of Subcontract Effort. Any cost information required under FAR 52.215-22 should be submitted in Excel with working formulas.
11. Compliance with Host Nation Laws, Including Labor Laws: Provide an affirmative statement that the offeror understands and will fully comply with current host nation laws, including labor laws, throughout contract performance, and that all costs proposed are consistent with current host nation laws.
12. Any other items necessary to explain the offeror’s proposal.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .