Attachment_0005_Data_Item_Descriptions_(DID)_Index.docx
DOCX document 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Contract Multiple Award Meltable Fuze Plug
- Solicitation number
- W15QKN17R0004
About this file
Attachment 0005 Data Item Description (DID)
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION (DID) INDEX
For Meltable Fuze Plug
| Number |
| Title |
| Date |
| Document |
| DI-SESS-81315B |
| (FACAR) Failure Analysis and Corrective Action Report |
| 28 March 2012 |
| DI-STDZ-80000C |
| DATA Item Description (DIDS) |
| 02 February 2015 |
| DI-ADMN-80447A |
| Contract Summary Report |
| 08 November 2006 |
| DI-ADMN-81505 |
| Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes |
| 20 November 1995 |
| DI-MGMT-81255 |
| Production Status Report |
| 02 March 1992 |
| DI-MISC-80043B |
| Ammunition Data Card |
| 02 April 2014 |
| DI-MISC-80678 |
| Certification/Data Report |
| 12 September 1988 |
| DI-NDTI-80809B |
| Test/Inspection Report |
| 27 August 2014 |
| DI-QCIC-81110 |
| Inspection and Test Plan |
| 12 August 2014 |
| DI-QCIC-81722 |
| Quality Program Plan (QPP) |
| 29 November 2006 |
| DI-QCIC-81960 |
| Measurement System Evaluation (MSE) |
| 25 February 2014 |
| DI-SAFT-81563 |
| Accident/Incident Report |
| 02 June 1998 |
| DI-SESS-80639D |
| Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) |
| 07 April 2015 |
| DI-SESS-80640D |
| Request For Variance (RFV) |
| 07 April 2015 |
| DI-SESS-80642D |
| Notice of Revision (NOR) |
| 07 April 2015 |
image3.emf
DI-ADMN-80447A Contract Summary Report.pdf
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Title: Contract Summary Report
Number: DI-ADMN-80447A Approval Date: 08 NOV 2006 AMSC Number: 7625 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: NS/DA02 Applicable Forms: N/A
Use/relationship:
This report summaries all work performed under the contract.
This Data Item Description (DID) contains format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirement as delineated in the contract.
This DID supersedes DI-ADMN-80447.
Requirements:
1. Reference documents. None.
2. Format. The report shall be prepared in contractor’s format.
2.1 It shall be typewritten and is to be duplicated in non-fading ink.
2.2 The data indicated below shall be contained on the title page:
2.2.1 Type of Report, Final
2.2.2 Purchase Description Title
2.2.3 Contract Number
2.2.4 Dates of the Reporting Period
2.3 Security classification and distribution limitation markings shall be included on all pages.
3. Content.
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T18:56Z
Check the source to verify that this is the current version before use.
DI-ADMN-80447A
3.1 Table on Contents.
3.2 Brief summary of all work accomplished, to include both negative and positive results. All information shall be referenced to the appropriate Progress Report, or section of the Final Report, where the subject is discussed in detail.
3.3 The body of the report shall describe all work accomplished, including as applicable, theoretical studies, experimental work mechanical design, theory of operation, test procedures, test results, and those drawings, charts, graphs, illustrations, or other material needed to clarify the presentation.
3.4 When test equipment has been designed and constructed for use on this contract, a listing of all such equipment is to be included. This listing shall include all related drawings and associated lists. It shall be referenced in the report and included as an appendix.
3.5 Conclusions, recommendations, and proposals.
3.6 Appendixes for any necessary tables, references, photographs, charts, and illustrations.
4. END OF DI-ADMN-80447A
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T18:56Z
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Requirements:
image4.emf
DI-ADMN-81505.pdf
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T18:52Z image5.emf
DI-MGMT 81255 Production Status Report.pdf
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T18:50Z image6.emf
DI-MISC-80043B NOT 1 Ammo Data Card.pdf
Ammunition Data Card
DI-MISC-80043B, dated 23-Jun-2009, has been reviewed and determined to be valid for use in acquisition.
NOTICE OF
VALIDATION
DI-MISC-80043B
NOTICE 1
02-Apr-2014
NOTE: The activities above were interested in this document as of the date of this document. Since organizations and responsibilities can change, you should verify the currency of the information above using the ASSIST Online database at https://assist.dla.mil.
AMSC N/A AREA MISC
Preparing Activity:
Army - AR
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T18:21Z https://assist.dla.mil image7.emf
DI-MISC-80678 Certification and Data Report.pdf
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T18:23Z
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T18:23Z image8.emf
DI-NDTI-80809B Test and Inspection Report.pdf
Test/Inspection Report
DI-NDTI-80809B, dated 24-Jan-1997, has been reviewed and
DI-NDTI-80809B
27-Aug-2014 responsibilities can change, you should verify the currency of
AMSC N/A AREA NDTI
Air Force - 20
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T18:25Z image9.emf
DI-QCIC-81110 Inspection and Test Plan.pdf
Inspection and Test Plan
DI-QCIC-81110, dated 19-Dec-1990, has been reviewed and
DI-QCIC-81110
12-Aug-2014 responsibilities can change, you should verify the currency of
AMSC N/A AREA QCIC
Navy - AS
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T18:28Z image10.emf
DI-QCIC-81722 (QPP).pdf
Title: Quality Program Plan (QPP)
Number: DI-QCIC-81722 Approval Date: 29 NOV 2006 AMSC Number: 7676 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: NS/I5223 Applicable Forms: N/A
Use/Relationship:
The Quality Program Plan (QPP) describes the methodology that will be used to meet the quality requirements needed for the specific program. The object of the plan is to define and document what, where, and how to procure, fabricate, assemble, inspect, test and deliver only units and other end products that conform to quality standards. The QPP should start with the contractor’s standard quality system and detail changes to that. The QPP shall be used to verify attainability of contract objectives in the area of producing reliable, quality products. This DID is applicable to development, low rate initial production and full rate production efforts.
a. This DID contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific requirement delineated in the contract and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001, Quality Management Systems – Requirements (Entire Document).
b. The prime contractor is required to include information from significant suppliers (eg, PWAs) or teammates regarding their standard quality system requirements and any deviations specific to this program.
1. Reference Documents: The applicable issue of the documents herein, including, their approval dates and the dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as cited in the current issue of the DODISS at the time of the solicitation; or, for non DODISS-listed documents, as stated herein. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9001 Quality Management Systems – Requirements, current edition, is available at International Organization for Standardization website http://www.iso.org/iso/en/ISOOnline.frontpage.
2. Format: Contractor format is acceptable using 8 ½ x 11 in. paper.
3. Content:
3.1 The data item shall have a Title page containing the following information as a minimum:
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T18:27Z
DI-QCIC-81722
3.1.1 Title
3.1.2 CDRL exhibit number
3.1.3 Revision level
3.1.4 Approval/submission
3.1.5 Date
3.1.6 Program name
3.1.7 Contract number
3.1.8 Contractor’s name and address
3.1.9 Data item author
3.1.10 Signature
3.1.11 Approval record
3.2 The data item shall have a table of contents if the length of the document warrants.
3.3 The data item shall have a revision status log page which includes the various revision levels, dates, and summary description of the changes made.
3.4 The QPP shall reference any Industry standard for which the contractor has a current certification. The plan shall reference the contractor’s current Quality Manual, number or identification, and date. The plan shall then detail any changes, deletions or additions to the contractor’s standard requirements, and shall delineate the specific Industry workmanship standards and levels for soldering, printed wiring assembly, etc, that are to be applied to the program. The government shall concur in use of any standard repair procedures and conditions for use on the program.
3.5 The QPP shall include an organizational chart identifying the Product Assurance (PA) organization, names and titles of key PA personnel assigned to the program, and how the PA organization relates to the corporate structure.
3.6 The QPP shall include a proposed end item product flow including test & inspection points. The plan shall briefly address the following topics if different from or not included in the quality manual: quality audit frequency, depth, and independence; process certification and control of automated processes; “cannot duplicate” (CND) and nonconforming material processes; incoming inspection/test, certified supplier program and parts control; and any unique requirements for the program.
4. END OF DI-QCIC-81722
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T18:27Z image11.emf
DI-QCIC-81960 MSE.pdf
DI-QCIC-81960
Title: MEASUREMENT SYSTEM EVALUATION (MSE) – MEASUREMENT AND INSPECTION
EQUIPMENT SYSTEM DESIGN DOCUMENTATION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PRODUCT
Number: DI-QCIC-81960 Approval Date: 25 February 2014 ASMC Number: 9461 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: (AR) , RDAR-EIQ-SE Applicable Forms: N/A
Use/relationship: The Measurement and Inspection Equipment System Design documentation for Acceptance of Product describes the Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AIE), Automated AIE (AAIE), and various measurement systems, used to meet the inspection and test requirements to deliver units and other end products that conform to contract, specification, QAP and drawing requirements. This documentation is used to evaluate the acceptability of these designs to meet contract requirements.
a. This Data Item Description (DID) contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific requirement delineated in the contract.
b. This DID is applicable to all AIE as required by the contract.
Requirements:
1. Reference Documents. The applicable documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as cited in contract documentation.
2. Format. Contractor’s format is acceptable.
3. Content. An AIE package shall include the following (as applicable).
3.1 Cover Sheet. Cover sheet information includes the following:
a. Prime contractor name, address, and contact information.
b. Contract number.
c. Nomenclature of item(s) being produced under contract.
d. Applicable drawing(s), specifications and Quality Assurance Provisions (QAPs).
e. Date and revision of “New” or “Revised” documentation.
f. Sub-component or assembly (if applicable).
g. Subcontractor(s) name, address, and contact information (if applicable).
3.2 Measuring and Inspection Equipment System Design Documentation. Measuring and inspection equipment system design documentation covers a variety of measurement systems and equipment used to evaluate acceptability of units to meet requirements. See ISO 9000 paragraph 3.8.2, Inspection and 3.10.4, Measuring Equipment.
3.3 Master List / Matrix. A detailed Master List or Matrix cross references each characteristic and its inspection requirement from the applicable drawings, specifications and QAPs with the proposed inspection methods and equipment. The Master List or Matrix information includes the following:
a. Drawing, specification or QAP number with revision and date of item being inspected.
b. Amendments, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs), Notices of Revision (NORs), etc.
c. Specification or QAP paragraph number.
d. Drawing, specification, or QAP characteristic letter/number, description, and inspection requirement.
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-08-25T18:29Z
e. Inspection method with AIE identification with description, revision, and date.
f. Clearly indicate any revisions from previous submission(s).
3.4 Go-No Go/Functional Gages. Gage information includes the following:
a. Gage drawing number (design identification) with revision and date.
b. Drawings showing gage dimensions with tolerances.
c. Drawings showing gage material with surface finish and hardness of contacting gage elements.
d. Associated inspection procedures and theory of operation (as required, see ISO 10012).
3.5 Standard Measurement Equipment (SME). SME information includes the following:
a. Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy.
b. Associated inspection procedures and theory of operation (as required, see ISO 10012).
3.6 Special Inspection Equipment/Methods. It includes Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM), Tool Control (TC), Non-Destructive Testing (NDT), Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE), Destructive, Environmental, and Functional Test Equipment. It also includes inspection equipment that is not commercially available along with the corresponding design drawings.
a. Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM). CMM information includes the following per ASME
B89.4.10360.2-2008:
i. Establishment of the geometry (Datums) and inspection process of the desired characteristic by the CMM. Include the number and location of probe hits to establish geometry (Datums) and any axis necessary to adequately inspect the feature.
ii. Environmental conditions and limits which may influence measurements.
iii. Operating procedures including machine start/warm up cycles, probing system qualification, probe cleaning, and probe calibrations.
iv. Periodic reverification tests in accordance with the user's specification and manufacturer’s procedures including repeatability of point coordinates and length measurement and repeatability.
v. Interim checks between periodic reverifications.
vi. Procedure for checking the CMM immediately after a significant event which could impact CMM performance.
b. Tool Control (TC). Tool Control information includes the following:
i. Measurements of form tools (punches, dies, molds, etc.) and correlation data between tool dimension and component dimension.
ii. Inspection frequency and gages used to measure the form tooling.
iii. Process control parameters that affect the component dimension.
iv. Procedures for tool control inspection including out of tolerance tool control dimension procedures, corrective action plans, and segregation of product since last successful inspection.
c. Non-Destructive Testing (NDT). NDT information includes the following:
i. Written procedures for the qualification and certification of NDT personnel and the certification records for each inspector, as described in NAS410 (NAS Certification & Qualification of NDT Personnel), ANSI/ASNT-CP-189 (ASNT Standard for Qualification and Certification of NDT Personnel), or SNT-TC-1A (Recommended
Practice for Personnel Qualification and Certification in NDT), and additional procedures identified by the Government.
ii. Records for other certification standards shall identify the applicable standard and confirm the levels of qualification of individuals responsible for acceptance of product to be consistent with those defined in the standard.
iii. The design documentation, specific application techniques, and operating procedures in accordance with ASTM E 543 (Standard Specification for Agencies Performing Nondestructive Testing) and the applicable nationally recognized standard practice(s) specific to the NDT method(s) employed on the contract, such as ASTM E-1742 (Standard Practice for Radiographic Examination) and SAE-AMS- STD-2154 (Inspection, Ultrasonic, Wrought Metals, Process For).
iv. Documentation on application techniques shall identify the applicable standard(s) utilized.
d. Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE) & Complex Designs. For AIE designs that are complex in nature, (e.g., open set-up, computer controlled, numerically controlled, multistation, and acceptance inspection equipment which is part of an integrated production and assembly system) the following information is to be provided:
i. Concept designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 3, paragraph 3.2.1) includes:
(1) Sketches of the inspecting elements.
(2) Theory of operation including mechanical, electrical, and unique software operating conditions with associated logic flow diagrams.
(3) Description of the calibration and verification programs and standards.
(4) Description of all fail-safe measures that lead to rejection of Unit Under Test
(UUT).
(5) A proposed test plan to qualify the accuracy of inspection and correctness of accept or reject decisions and resultant actions.
(6) Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy of any commercial device to be incorporated in the design.
(7) A method for verifying the integrity of the code (e.g., checksum or cyclic redundancy check).
ii. Detailed proposed designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 4, paragraph 3.2.2) include:
a. After concept approval and before any fabrication:
(1) Drawings of the inspecting elements.
(2) Proposed system operation including mechanical, electrical, and unique software operating conditions with associated logic flow diagrams. Drawings of the calibration or verification standards.
(3) The computer test program to include software version, software design parameters, and flow charts showing acceptance/rejection settings and computer generated test stimuli (as differentiated from computer controlled standard test equipment stimuli).
(4) Schematic or block diagram of test and measuring circuits where applicable.
(5) Layout or block diagram showing overall equipment arrangement and interconnection, including the Unit Under Test (UUT).
(6) Details of adapters, cables, holding fixtures and like items as applicable.
b. Before performing the test to qualify the AIE:
(1) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification instructions.
(2) The final test plan.
(3) Computer test program, acceptance/rejection settings and a flow diagram.
(4) Detailed operating instructions indicating application of the AIE and the acceptance/rejection settings.
(5) The calibration program for each item of computer controlled test equipment and a sample printout of an actual test and calibration.
(6) A printout of the work instructions which are displayed for the operator.
iii. Final designs (MIL-A-70625A, p. 6, paragraph 3.2.5) include:
(1) Results of the test including data generated, printout of test results (when normally generated), unique software test results, and calibration results.
(2) Design depicting the equipment as it was tested.
(3) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification procedures
(4) Calibration and verification records.
e. Destructive, Environmental, and Functional Test Equipment. For Destructive, Environmental, and Functional (DEF) test equipment, the following information is to be provided:
i. Proposed AIE designs include:
(1) Theory of operation.
(2) Detailed drawings or sketches of the inspecting and testing elements and sufficient detail for supporting elements to facilitate evaluation for adequacy.
(3) Manufacturer, model, resolution, and accuracy of any commercial device to be incorporated in the design along with any modifications in design or use.
(4) Description of the calibration and verification programs and standards.
(5) A proposed test plan to qualify the accuracy of inspection and correctness of accept or reject decisions and resultant actions (as required).
(6) Setup, calibration, operation, and verification procedures and parameters.
(7) Settings, test conditions, calculations, and verification.
(8) Calibration and verification records.
ii. When DEF test equipment consists of AAIE or complex Designs, AIE design submissions shall include the requirements of paragraph 3.6.d above.
f. Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA). MSA is any of a number of specialized methods useful for studying a measurement system and its properties (ASTM E2782, paragraph 3.1.7).
There are several basic properties of measurement systems that are widely recognized among practitioners. These are repeatability, reproducibility, linearity, bias, stability, consistency, and resolution (ASTM E2782, paragraph 5.4). An MSA is to include these properties, as applicable.
End of DI-QCIC-81960 image12.emf
DI-SAFT-81563 NOT 1 Accident and Incident Report.pdf
DI-SAFT-81563
9 June 2014
Accident/Incident Report
DI-SAFT-81563 dated 2 June 1998, has been reviewed and determined to be valid for use in acquisition.
Preparing activity:
Army – AR
Note: The activities listed above were interested in this document as of the date of this document.
Since organizations and responsibilities can change, you should verify the currency of the information above using the ASSIST online database at https://assist.dla.mil.
AMSC N/A FSC SAFT
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
INCH-POUND
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T18:49Z https://assist.dla.mil/ image13.emf
DI-SESS-80639D ECP.pdf
Title: ENGINEERING CHANGE PROPOSAL (ECP)
Number: DI-SESS-80639D Approval Date: 20150407
AMSC Number: N9521 Limitation: N/A
DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No
Preparing Activity: NM Project Number: SESS-2015-011
Applicable Forms: DD Form 1692, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP)
Use/relationship: An Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) provides the documentation in which the engineering change is described and how the proposed change will be implemented.
a. This DID contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in paragraph 3.3.1 (1) of EIA-649-1 and the principles of EIA-649.
b. This DID may be used in conjunction with DI-SESS-80642, Notice of Revision (NOR). A requirement for
NORs should be contractually imposed in conjunction with this DID.
c. This DID supersedes DI-CMAN-80639C and DI-SESS-81880.
d. Copies of these standards are available online at http://www.sae.org or from SAE International, 400
Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, Tel 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) or 724-776-4970
(outside USA).
e. An electronic version of DD Form 1692, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP), is available online at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/forms/index.htm.
1. Reference Documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as specified in the contract.
2. Format. The ECP shall be in one of the following formats:
a. DD Form 1692, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP),
b. The schema required by the Acquirer’s Integrated Digital Environment (IDE), or
c. The Supplier’s preferred format.
3. Content. The ECP shall contain all the information in DD Form 1692.
End of DI-SESS-80639D
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T16:54Z http://www.sae.org/ http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/forms/index.htm image14.emf
DI-SESS-80640D RFV.pdf
Title: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE (RFV)
Number: DI-SESS-80640D Approval Date: 20150407
AMSC Number: N9522 Limitation: N/A
Preparing Activity: NM Project Number: SESS-2015-012
Applicable Forms: DD Form 1694, Request for Variance (RFV)
Use/relationship: A Request for Variance describes a proposed departure from (a non-conformance with) approved product definition information for a limited amount of time/specified effectivity or a product found to be nonconforming with product definition information after the product has been produced by the production process.
a. This DID contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in paragraphs 3.3.2 (1)-(6) of EIA-649-1 and the principles of EIA-649.
b. This DID supersedes DI-CMAN-80640C and DI-SESS-81883.
c. Copies of these standards are available online at http://www.sae.org or from SAE International, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, Tel 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) or 724-776-4970 (outside USA).
d. An electronic version of DD Form 1694, Request for Variance (RFV), is available online at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/forms/index.htm.
Requirements:
1. Reference Documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their approval dates and
2. Format. The RFV shall be in one of the following formats:
a. DD Form 1694, Request for Variance (RFV),
b. The schema required by the Acquirer’s Integrated Data Environment (IDE), or
3. Content. The RFV shall contain all the information in DD Form 1694.
End of DI-SESS-80640D
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T16:56Z image15.emf
DI-SESS-80642D NOR.pdf
Title: NOTICE OF REVISION (NOR)
Number: DI-SESS-80642D Approval Date: 20150407
AMSC Number: N9523 Limitation: N/A
Preparing Activity: NM Project Number: SESS-2015-013
Applicable Forms: DD Form 1695, Notice of Revision (NOR)
Use/relationship: A Notice of Revision (NOR) describes the proposed changes to a technical document being requested by an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP).
a. This DID contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in paragraph 3.3.4 (1)-(2) of EIA-649-1 and the principles of EIA-649.
b. This DID may be used in conjunction with DI-SESS-80639, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP), and
DI-SESS-80643, Specification Change Notice (SCN).
c. This DID supersedes DI-CMAN-80642C and DI-SESS-81881.
d. Copies of these standards are available online at http://www.sae.org or from SAE International, 400
Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, Tel 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) or 724-776-4970
(outside USA).
e. An electronic version of DD Form 1695, Notice of Revision (NOR), is available online at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/forms/index.htm.
1. Reference Documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their approval dates and
2. Format. The NOR shall be in one of the following formats:
a. DD Form 1695, Notice of Revision (NOR),
b. The schema required by the Acquirer’s Integrated Digital Environment (IDE), or
3. Content. The NOR shall contain all the information in DD Form 1695.
End of DI-SESS-80642D
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T16:53Z image1.emf
DI-SESS-81315B FACAR.pdf
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T18:55Z image2.emf
DI-STDZ-80000C (DID).pdf
Title: DATA ITEM DESCRIPTIONS (DIDs)
Number: DI-STDZ-80000C Approval Date: 20150203 AMSC Number: 9512 Limitation:
DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No Preparing Activity: SO Project Number: STDZ-2015-002 Applicable Forms: N/A
Use/Relationship: This DID contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in the solicitation.
This DID supersedes DI-MISC-80000B.
1. Reference documents. The applicable issue of the document cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as specified in the solicitation or contract.
2. Format and Content. Format and content of DIDs shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-963 (http://quicksearch.dla.mil).
END OF DI-STDZ-80000C
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-03-09T18:19Z http://quicksearch.dla.mil/
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .