Service Level & Deliver.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 119 KB Posted
- Attached to
- STC Managed Cloud Services State and local contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 5400028075
- Issued by
- South Carolina
About this file
The document is a Service Level and Deliverable Matrix for Public Cloud Manager Services (PCM) related to a state government contract (Solicitation No. 5400028075) involving state agency and other government entity customers. The matrix outlines critical and key service levels, one-time critical deliverables, and recurring critical deliverables for cloud management services. The contract includes a comprehensive transition plan, operational readiness assessment, service management manual development, system security planning, disaster recovery planning, and ongoing annual reporting requirements. The service levels cover areas such as service availability, incident resolution, service request fulfillment, root cause analysis, solution implementation, data recovery, change management, and vulnerability management.
The contract includes a complex service level credit mechanism with a 15% at-risk percentage and a 250% pool percentage available for allocation. Service level credits range from 3% to 6% of the monthly invoice for missed performance targets, with different expected and minimum service levels for state agency and other government entity customers. Critical deliverables carry financial penalties ranging from $500 to $5,000 per day for late or non-compliant submissions. The matrix emphasizes continuous improvement, with most service levels subject to ongoing enhancement and detailed reporting requirements, including annual security plans, customer experience improvement plans, disaster recovery testing, and technology standards recommendations.
View the file
Other files for this state and local contract opportunity
Show all 33
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Title Page
Managed Cloud Services
| Exhibit 3.1 |
| Service Level and Deliverable Matrix |
Solicitation No. 5400028075
&K000000Attachment 1.2 Service Level Matrix Public Cloud Manager Services (PCM)
&K000000DIR-CPO-STS-585 Page &P of &N
Introduction
INTRODUCTION
This Exhibit 3.1 Service Level and Deliverable Matrix sets forth the following:
| 1. For Critical Service Levels: Exhibit 3.2 (Service Level Definitions): |
| - the numeric measurements for Service Levels; |
| - the timing regarding the commencement of obligations for each Critical Service Level |
| - a cross-reference to Exhibit 3.2 (Service Level Definitions) where the qualitative description of the Critical Service Level can be found |
| 2. For Key Service Levels: Exhibit 3.2 (Service Level Definitions): |
| - the numeric measurements for Service Levels; |
| - a cross-reference to Exhibit 3.2 (Service Level Definitions) where the qualitative description of the Key Service Levels can be found |
| 3. For One Time Critical Deliverables: |
| - the timing regarding the commencement of obligations for each One Time Deliverable |
| - the name, source document and description of the activities that comprise the Deliverable |
| - the description of the Acceptance Criteria that will indicate Acceptance and completion of the Deliverable |
| - the reference as to whether or not the Deliverable is Critical and/or Payment Deliverable as set forth in Exhibit 1.4 General Provisions, Section 2.5 |
| - the due date for the Deliverable |
| 4. For Recurring Critical Deliverables: |
| - the timing regarding the commencement of obligations for each One Time Deliverable |
| - the name, source document and description of the activities that comprise the Deliverable |
| - the description of the Acceptance Criteria that will indicate Acceptance and completion of the Deliverable |
| - the reference as to whether or not the Deliverable is Critical and/or Payment Deliverable as set forth in Exhibit 1.4 General Provisions, Section 2.5 |
| - the due date for the Deliverable |
&K000000Attachment 1.2 Service Level Matrix Public Cloud Manager Services (PCM)
&K000000DIR-CPO-STS-585 Page &P of &N
1. Critical Service Levels Critical Service Level Matrix - MCS
| At Risk Percentage | 15% | ||||||||||
| Pool Percentage available for allocation | 250% | ||||||||||
| Exhibit 3.2 Section Reference | Service Level Categories | Comm | |||||||||
| + mos(1) | Expected Service Level (ESL) (2) | Minimum Service Level (MSL) (3) | Measurement Window | Continuous Improvement Application (4) | Service Level Credit Percentage | Service Level Credit Percentage of Monthly Invoice for each Critical Service Level miss | Service Level Applicable Service Tiers | ||||
| State Agency Customers | Other Government Entity Customers | ||||||||||
| 1.1 | Service Provider Services Availability | 0 | 99.99% | 99.95% | Monthly | No | 25.00% | 3.75% | Yes | Yes | |
| 1.2 | Incident Resolution Time - Priority 1 and Priority 2 Incidents | 0 | 99.00% | 98.00% | Monthly | No | 30.00% | 4.50% | Yes | Yes | |
| 1.3 | Service Request Fulfillment | 0 | 98.00% | 96.00% | Monthly | Yes | 25.00% | 3.75% | Yes | Yes | |
| 1.4 | Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Delivery | 0 | 98.00% | 97.00% | Monthly | No | 20.00% | 3.00% | Yes | Yes | |
| 1.5 | RCA Corrective Action Implementation | 0 | 99.00% | 98.00% | Monthly | No | 20.00% | 3.00% | Yes | Yes | |
| 1.6 | Solution Proposal Delivery | 0 | 97.00% | 95.00% | Monthly | Yes | 30.00% | 4.50% | Yes | Yes | |
| 1.7 | Solution Implementation | 0 | 98.00% | 97.00% | Monthly | Yes | 40.00% | 6.00% | Yes | Yes | |
| 1.8 | Data Recovery Request | 0 | 99.90% | 99.50% | Monthly | No | 20.00% | 3.00% | Yes | Yes | |
| 1.9 | Change Management Effectiveness | 0 | 98.00% | 96.00% | Monthly | No | 20.00% | 3.00% | Yes | Yes | |
| 1.10 | Vulnerability Management | 0 | 99.00% | 98.00% | Monthly | No | 20.00% | 3.00% | Yes | Yes | |
| Notes: | 250.00% | 37.50% | |||||||||
| (1) Number of Months after Commencement Date when the Service Provider is responsible for Service Level performance and Service Level Credits due for Service Level Default. | |||||||||||
| (2) ESL will have the same meaning as Expected Service Level. | |||||||||||
| (3) MSL will have the same meaning as Minimum Service Level. | |||||||||||
| (4) The SLA is subject to continuous improvement as set forth in Exhibit 3.0 (Performance Model), unless noted as an exception, "No", in this continuous improvement application column. |
&K000000Attachment 1.2 Service Level Matrix Public Cloud Manager Services (PCM)
&K000000DIR-CPO-STS-585 Page &P of &N
2. Key Service Levels
Key Service Level Matrix - MCS
| Service Level Applicable Service Tiers | |||||||||
| Exhibit 3.2 | |||||||||
| Section Reference | Service Level Categories | Comm | |||||||
| + mos(1) | Expected Service Level (ESL) (2) | Minimum Service Level (MSL) (3) | Measurement Window | Continuous Improvement Application (4) | State Agency Customers | Other Government Entity Customers | |||
| 2.1 | Invoice Dispute Resolution | 0 | 97.00% | 95.00% | Monthly | No | Yes | Yes | |
| 2.2 | ROM Proposal Delivery | 0 | 98.00% | 97.00% | Monthly | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| 2.3 | Incident Resolution Time - Priority 3 and Priority 4 Incidents | 0 | 99.00% | 95.00% | Monthly | No | Yes | Yes |
| Notes: |
| (1) Number of Months after Commencement Date when the Service Provider is responsible for Service Level performance and Service Level Credits due for Service Level Default. |
| (2) ESL will have the same meaning as Expected Service Level. |
| (3) MSL will have the same meaning as Minimum Service Level. |
| (4) The SLA is subject to continuous improvement as set forth in Exhibit 3.0 (Performance Model), unless noted as an exception, "No", in this continuous improvement application column. |
&K000000Attachment 1.2 Service Level Matrix Public Cloud Manager Services (PCM)
&K000000DIR-CPO-STS-585 Page &P of &N
3. One-Time Del One Time Critical Deliverables - MCS
| Reference ID | Applies to State Agency Customer Operations | Applies to Other Government Entity Customer Operations | One Time Critical Deliverable Title | Description | Minimum Acceptance Criteria | |
| (Specific, Measurable, Time bounded Outcomes) | Critical Deliverable | Payment Deliverable to (be finalized during negotiations) | Final Due | |||
| Date | Deliverable Credit | Frequency |
Credit
| Applies | Proposed # of Deliverable reviews | |||||
| 1.1 | Yes | Yes | Transition Plan and Transition Project Plan | This deliverable will include the Service Provider's Transition Plan (docx) and Transition Project Plan (.mpp) with the transition tasks and activities necessary to successfully migrate all applicable Services from the current Contract. | The Transition Project Plan must include a detailed task/activity level for the planned Transition period, inclusive of activities, deliverables, and dependencies. |
The Transition Project Plan deliverable must include documentation of required 2 reviews conducted with Admin prior to final submission.
The Detailed Transition Project Plan must also include at a minimum the following:
1. Project Integration – among Admin, reliant or dependent SCPs, and Customers;
2. Stakeholder goals and expectations;
3. Project Scope;
4. Project Time;
5. Project Schedule Management Plan;
6. Project Change Management;
7. Project Quality Measures and Management Plan ;
8. Project/Transition Staffing;
9. Project Communications;
10. Risk Register for risk and issue tracking;
11. Plan and associated timelines for developing Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) and other system integrations to support automated reporting, data feeds, etc., into the Admin tools, including any know interdependencies or resource requirements for Admin or other SCPs;
12. A description of the documentation, methods and procedures, personnel and organization the Service Provider will use to perform the Transition;
13. Completed Transition Milestone Document capturing transition milestone objectives, Acceptance Criteria, dates, dependencies, owners, and review teams. Written agreement with each dependent SCP and Admin confirming dependencies and alignment with transition plan.
| Yes | Twenty (20) days after Effective Date | $5,000 | Daily | 2 | |
| 1.2 | Yes | Yes | Operational Readiness Assessment | The Service Provider will provide documentation to support its readiness to operate and maintain the functionality deployed and recommend strategies to ensure the State, Admin Customers, and SCPs are prepared to support any migrated or new system functionality | Confirmation of integration with Admin and other SCPs as required |
Documentation of required 4 reviews conducted with Admin prior to final submission.
Confirmation of alignment with Admin processes/procedures in the SMMs and identification of any critical gaps in documentation or processes Updated Key Personnel contact information and staff employment status Documented operational processes/procedures needed to deliver Services and status of publication on the Admin portal Status of Service transfers Status of software license transfers Status of hardware transfers Status of lease transfers Billing process including providing State Agency billing details to Admin in the Admin-agreed formats Status of knowledge transfer programs and KT Transition to Steady State item status Provide current updated version of the operational readiness checklist, which must include but is not limited to topic, status, owner, risks, dependencies, date opened, date closed/completed, and associated risk mitigation plans.
| Yes | Thirty (30) Days prior to Commencement | $5,000 | Daily | 4 | |
| 1.3.1 | Yes | Yes | Service Management Manual (SMM) Phase I | The Service Provider will document appropriate policies, processes, and procedures for inclusion in the SMM. | Publication of a .doc document that describes how the SMM requirements will be satisfied: |
- Structure and hierarchy
- Document templates
- Descriptions of contents for SMM implementation phases I-III
Documentation of required 1 review conducted with Admin prior to final submission.
Publication of required Phase I SMM sections as defined in Exhibit 1.3 Service Management Manual
• SMM content aligned with SMM Phase I contents and structure
• Processes reflect the requirements of the Agreement
• Detailed descriptions of policies, processes, and procedures are documented in the manual.
• Roles and responsibilities are defined for Service Provider, Admin, other SCPs, and/or Customers as appropriate.
• Dependencies and relationships are documented.
• Risks associated with procedures are identified and mitigation strategies documented for each risk.
| • The policies and procedures are consistent with the proposed project approach | Yes | Twenty (20) days after Effective Date | $500 | Daily | 1 | |
| 1.3.2 | Yes | Yes | Service Management Manual (SMM) Phase II | The Service Provider will document appropriate policies, processes, and procedures for inclusion in the SMM. | Publication of a .doc document that details the processes support the SMM requirements: |
- Roles and responsibilities
- Inputs and outputs
- Tool in place with Service Management SMMs loaded
- Published UAT results confirm SMM is performing as expected, in accordance with the SMM requirements, and contains the expected content Documentation of required 2 reviews conducted with Admin prior to final submission
Acknowledgement of alignment with established Phase II SMM sections and/or Publication of required new Phase II SMM sections as defined in Exhibit 1.3 Service Management Manual
• SMM content aligned with SMM Phase II contents and structure
• Processes reflect the requirements of the Agreement
• Detailed descriptions of policies, processes, and procedures are documented in the manual
• Roles and responsibilities are defined for Admin, SCPs, and/or Customers as appropriate
• Dependencies and relationships are documented
• Risks associated with procedures are identified and mitigation strategies documented for each risk
| • The policies and procedures are consistent with the proposed project approach | Yes | Ten (10) Days prior to Commencement | $500 | Daily | 2 | |
| 1.3.3 | Yes | Yes | Service Management Manual (SMM) Phase III | The Service Provider will document appropriate policies, processes, and procedures for inclusion in the SMM. | Publication of a .doc document with: |
- the summary of the Phase III scope
- the hyperlinks to SMM artifacts in the SMM repository
- the screenshots from SMM repository on how to navigate and to find the SMM artifacts
Documentation of required 2 reviews conducted with Admin prior to final submission.
Acknowledgement of alignment with established Phase III SMM sections and/or Publication of required new Phase III SMM sections as defined in Exhibit 1.3 Service Management Manual
• SMM content aligned with SMM Phase III contents and structure
• Processes reflect the requirements of the Agreement
• Detailed descriptions of policies, processes, and procedures are documented in the manual.
• Roles and responsibilities are defined for Admin, SCP, and/or Customers as appropriate.
• Dependencies and relationships are documented.
• Risks associated with procedures are identified and mitigation strategies documented for each risk.
• The policies and procedures are consistent with the proposed project approach
| Yes | Sixty (60) days after Commencement | $500 | Daily | 2 | ||||||
| 1.4 | Yes | Yes | Transition Milestones Complete | All milestones from the Transition Phase 1 project plan are accepted in writing by the State. | The Service Provider shall execute the agreed upon Project Plan. The submission of this deliverable is confirmation by the parties that all interim and major milestones, due to be completed according to the established and agreed upon monthly baseline schedule, are both submitted by Service Provider and accepted by the State in writing in accordance with Acceptance Criteria defined in the Transition Milestone document following the transition governance framework and process. | |||||
| Yes | Twenty (20) days after Commencement | $5,000 | Daily | N/A | ||||||
| 1.5 | Yes | Yes | System Security Plan (SSP) | The Service Provider will create a System Security Plan(s) (SSP) for MCS Services. | Service Provider shall provide to Admin, for Admin’s review and approval the Service Provider’s SSP documenting the security requirements for MCS Services. Service Provider to complete the security controls template for each public cloud environment (e.g. AWS GOV, AWS Commercial, Azure GOV, Azure Commercial). Upon acceptance of this Deliverable by Admin, the documents will be maintained as part of the SMM. | Yes | One hundred eighty (180) days after Commencement | $5,000 | Daily | 2 |
| 1.6 | Yes | Yes | Disaster Recovery Plan For Service Provider Services | The Service Provider will document disaster recovery processes for the Service Provider Services | Detailed Disaster Recovery Plan, including detailed Technical Recovery Guides for use in recovering services as defined in Exhibit 2.1, Section 6.12 IT Service Continuity Management |
- Create Disaster Recovery Plans to reflect Service Provider Services upon Commencement
| - Documentation of required 1 review conducted with Admin prior to final submission | Yes | Sixty (60) days after Commencement | $5,000 | Daily | |||||||
| 1.7 | Yes | No | In-Flight Demand and Project Takeover | The Service Provider will document completed in-flight State Agency project handling plans resulting in the takeover of all approved State Agency project activity | All projects submitted or in-flight prior to Commencement date will require the Service Provider to have RFS solutions and pricing submitted to Admin in accordance with agreed upon governance process and plan reviewed and documented during monthly RFS and project reporting meetings. | Yes | Sixty (60) days prior to Commencement | $5,000 | Daily | 1 | |
| 1.8 | Yes | Yes | Tooling Implementation Complete - Operationally Ready | The Service Provider will document tooling concepts, design, build and test documentation that demonstrates tooling implementation has been completed | Publication and agreement on Tools infrastructure deployment completed, captured in a document (.docx and/or .xlsx), that describes the outcome of the testing: |
- Test scenarios used to test
- Test results
- No open critical or high priority defects assigned to Service Provider
- Medium priority defects assigned to Service Provider have Admin approved business workaround
- List of defects and their resolution status (closed, open with target dates and workarounds)
- Detailed tooling listing and updated Tooling Integration template
Admin written acceptance of Tooling Approach (TRN Milestone #: TBD), Design (TRN Milestone #: TBD), Build and Testing (TRN Milestone #: TBD) with 2 demonstrated reviews;
- Updating of Design documentation as necessary for alignment to any changes determined post design and prior to implementation
| Yes | Sixty (60) days prior to Commencement | $5,000 | Daily | 2 | ||||||
| 1.9 | Yes | Yes | System Security Plan (SSP) Service Provider Deployed Tooling | The Service Provider will create a System Security Plan(s) (SSP) for Service Provider deployed tooling. | Service Provider shall provide to Admin, for Admin’s review and approval the Service Provider’s SSP documenting the security requirements for Admin deployed tooling. Upon acceptance of this Deliverable by Admin, the documents will be maintained as part of the SMM. | Yes | Thirty (30) days after Commencement | $5,000 | Daily | 2 |
&K000000Attachment 1.2 Service Level Matrix Public Cloud Manager Services (PCM)
&K000000DIR-CPO-STS-585 Page &P of &N
4. Recurring Del
Recurring Critical Deliverables - MCS
| Reference ID | Applies to State Agency Customer Operations | Applies to Other Government Entity Customer Operations | Recurring Deliverable Title | Description | Minimum Acceptance Criteria | |
| (Specific, Measurable, Time bounded Outcomes) | Deliverable Type | Critical Deliverable | Final Due | |||
| Date | Deliverable Credit | Frequency |
Credit Applies
| 2.1 | Yes | Yes | Annual Security Plan | The Service Provider shall deliver a Security Plan in accordance with the Statement of Work including the requirement to recommend improvements or enhancements for the security of state information and systems to stay current with the threat landscape. Plan shall include System Security Plans for the Service Provider's Systems. |
| Provide the State with an Information Security Plan pertaining to the Service Providers Services. |
Publication and agreement on the Service Provider Annual Information Security Plan as described in the SCDIS-200 Information Security and Privacy Standards, Controls Matrix worksheet, and captured in a State agreed format(s) that may include:
- Define security requirements, security management controls, and common controls for meeting those requirements.
-Identify and assign security program roles, responsibilities and Service Provider management commitment, and ensure coordination among Admin and Service Components
- Approval of the plan by Service Provider senior management and Admin
- Updates to the security plan to address changes and problems identified during plan implementation or security control assessment
- Initiation of a plan is developed and executed to address identified security and privacy deficiencies
- Assessment of risks and strategy and priorities for risk response actions.
- Develop, monitor, and report on the results of information security and privacy measures of performance, as directed by Admin
- Provide status on implementation and adherence to Information Security Controls
- Provide results from previous years security monitoring and measuring
| - Provide recommendations for investments and initiatives to improve the overall Information Security Program. | Unique Deliverable | Yes | TBD Annually | $500 | Daily | |
| 2.2 | Yes | No | Service Management Manual Currency - Quarterly Report | The Service Provider will comply with Admin's established annual schedule for reviewing and updating the SMM. The Service Provider shall support the Admin in providing a quarterly report of the review findings which demonstrates the currency and accuracy of the SMM sections reviewed in that quarter. At the beginning of each calendar year, Admin will provide a schedule for the year that outlines the sections of the Service Management Manual that will be reviewed in each quarter. The Admin's schedule may be modified throughout the year per mutual agreement with Admin. The Service Provider shall provide content and updates according to Admin's timeline to ensure SMM validity and currency. | Publication of the SMM review plan for the upcoming four quarters and report on the findings and updates made in the most recent quarter, including: |
- SMM review plan, agreed by Admin, by topics (e.g., sections, processes or functional area) with timeline and participants. Plan is to include a listing of all documents or content included in the review (e.g., policies, processes, procedures, work instructions, templates).
| - Report of the review findings and updates made over the previous quarter. | Unique Deliverable | Yes | Quarterly | $500 | Daily |
| 2.3 | Yes | No | Customer Experience Improvement Plan | Service Provider shall capture Customer experience opportunities as part of the Customer Experience Improvement Plan in the following scenarios: |
a. Three (3) months after the results of the annual Customer Satisfaction Surveys are available, the Service Provider shall provide an improvement plan to measure the applicable improvement of the Services identified in the Customer Satisfaction Surveys as requiring improvement; and
b. As Service Provider identifies opportunities throughout the term working with Customers, Admin, and the State.
b. The Service Provider shall work with Admin, the Admin customer relationship management office and other SCPs as appropriate to create improvements for each Service requiring improvement. The Customer Experience Improvement Plan shall be approved by Admin and improvement status reported monthly. Provide Admin with the Service Provider's portion of the Annual Customer Experience Improvement Plan in the required format, to be included in the complete Annual Customer Experience Improvement Plan deliverable submission to Admin.
Publication of the Customer Experience Improvement Plan, including:
- List of Admin Customer Experience Improvement Plan tickets by resolver team that have been created for or assigned to the Service Provider to address the recommendations.
- Action plans addressing issues identified in the previous survey across all Services and survey groups;
- Definitions of the issue being addressed, targeted improvement, timeline, owners, and solution approaches;
- Previously agreed actions and activities;
- Plans should be approved by Admin;
- Previous plan to have been reported against by Admin monthly or such other time as mutually agreed by Admin and Service Provider; and
- Submission and execution of Service Provider identified opportunities in working with Admin Customers.
| - Status of the prior years Customer Experience Improvement Plan identified opportunities including: timeliness in accordance with the Customer Experience Improvement Plan deliverable, SLA achievements, and where items were off target how the Service Provider worked to bring delivery back on track. | Unique Deliverable | Yes | TBD Annually | $500 | Daily | |
| 2.4 | Yes | Yes | Disaster Recovery Test For Service Provider Services | Service Provider shall develop and provide a disaster recovery test plan, execute the test, and schedule the next years test for Service Provider Systems. | Publish .doc/.xls document(s) that describes the Annual Service Provider Services Disaster Recovery Test Plan and Schedule including: |
- Schedule developed for the upcoming year inclusive of RTO/RPO for each Service Provider system/application
- Identifies major changes in requirements and new systems and applications since the previous year's test Publish .doc/.xls document(s) that describes the Annual Service Provider Services Disaster Recovery Test execution including:
- Proof of DR test execution and the results
- A narrative evaluation of the test against the DR test plan and objectives
| - Lessons learned and any DR system, program or process changes to be incorporated in the next years' test plan. | Unique Deliverable | Yes | TBD Annually | $500 | Daily | |
| 2.6 | Yes | Yes | Annual SOC 2, Type II, Report | SOC 2 Reporting on Controls at a Service Organization Relevant to Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, or Privacy (SOC 2) | Submit a document which adheres to the requirements in the Agreement for SOC 2 Reports, including: |
- is prepared by a recognized accounting firm qualified to perform such audits
- includes Service Provider's policies, procedures, controls and systems
- addresses the 12-month period agreed by the parties in advance
| - addresses all agreed State-requested changes to scope and timing | Unique Deliverable | No | TBD Annually | $1,000 | Monthly |
| 2.7 | Yes | No | Service Catalog Review |
Perform annual Service Catalog Review
- Review the Requests coming in as generic request to identify new catalog items or trends in usage of Generic Request when another Catalog Item was already available.
- Review and report on the use of each defined Catalog Item including usage trends and recommend improvements or new catalog items.
- Assess Service Catalog navigation and recommend improvements Publication of the Service Catalog Review, findings, and remediating actions captured in a .docx document that includes:
- Detailed review of all catalog items including trends and recommendations for improvement
- Detailed review of requests submitted as generic requests including - underlying type of request, alignment of the generic request to an existing catalog item, proposed solution to drive a more customer efficient Service Catalog
- Actions and remediation plans to improve service catalog efficiencies and usage, incorporating prioritization based on volume and impact
- Status update of closed and open findings and remediation actions
| - A forward-looking schedule for planned service catalog updates. | Unique Deliverable | No | TBD Annually | $1,000 | Monthly | |
| 2.8 | Yes | No | Technology Standards Recommendations | Service Provider shall create a Technology Standards Recommendations to support the State’s strategic direction and technical architecture needs each calendar year or at such time as mutually agreed to by the State and the Service Provider. | Publication of the annual Technology Standards review, findings, and recommendations captured in a .docx document that includes: |
- Description of cloud services and offerings by Service Provider that are in use on a quarterly basis.
- Updated description of standard, State-approved services and products available to Customers
- Recommendations on service and standard improvements that will improve the cloud services and are in alignment with the State’s strategic direction and technical architecture. Unique Deliverable No TBD Annually $500 Daily
&K000000Attachment 1.2 Service Level Matrix Public Cloud Manager Services (PCM)
&K000000DIR-CPO-STS-585 Page &P of &N image1.png image2.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .