PWS Attachment 19 - Vendor Performance Reports.pdf

PDF 44 KB Posted

Attached to
REO Case Management Support Services - Solicitation Amendment 00002 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
86615622R00009
Issued by
Department of Housing and Urban Development

About this file

This solicitation document requests proposals for REO case management support services. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development seeks a contractor to provide a FedRAMP compliant commercial web-based SaaS subscription service for REO case management and workflow tracking. The service must be operational and functional for basic business processes by the proposal due date of June 20, 2022. The contract will have a one-year base period from September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2023 including a three-month transition and a nine-month full performance period, with four one-year option periods. The contract will use both firm fixed price and indefinite delivery indefinite quantity line items, with only firm fixed price task orders issued against the IDIQ lines. The applicable NAICS code is 518210 with a small business size standard of $35 million.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to REO Case Management Support Services - Solicitation Amendment 00002, newest first.
File Type Posted
Solicitation Amendment 00002 86615622R00009 (Conformed Copy 07192022).pdf PDF
SF 30 - Solicitation Amendment 00002 07192022.pdf PDF
SF 30 - Solicitation Amendment 00002 07192022.pdf PDF
Attachment 0003 - Price Schedule (Revised 07192022).xls XLS spreadsheet
Solicitation Amendment 00002 86615622R00009 (Conformed Copy 07192022).pdf PDF
Attachment 0004 - Sample Price Breakdown with Rates (Revised 07192022).xls XLS spreadsheet
SF 30 Solicitation Amendment 00001.pdf PDF
Attachment 0001 - Performance Work Statement (Revised 06152022).docx DOCX document
Solicitation Amendment 86615622R00009 (Conformed Copy).pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 18 - Standard Report Listing (Revised 06152022).pdf PDF
Attachment 0004 - Sample Price Breakdown with Rates (Revised 06152022).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 0005 - Labor Category and Hours Breakdown Worksheet without Rates (Revised 06152022).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 0003 - Price Schedule (Revised 06152022).docx DOCX document
Attachment 0007 - Past Performance Survey.docx DOCX document
Attachment 0008 - Subcontracting Plan Template.docx DOCX document
Attachment 0003 - Price Schedule.docx DOCX document
PWS Attachment 2 - User Groups.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 1 - Geographical Locations.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 8 - Sample Inspection Forms.pdf PDF
Attachment 0001 - Performance Work Statement.docx DOCX document
Attachment 0010 - FSM Tasks (Informational Purposes Only).pdf PDF
Attachment 0005 - Labor Category and Hours Breakdown Worksheet without Rates.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
PWS Attachment 10 - Claim Form 27011.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 4 - Listing Period Progression.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 16 - Automatic Email Types.pdf PDF
Solicitation 86615622R00009.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 17 - SFHEDW Flow Chart.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 7 - Accounting Post Codes.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 12 - Payee Types and NAID Status.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 6 - WON Categories.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 14 - Sales Cancellation Reason Codes.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 15 - Contract Extension Reasons.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 9 - Reconveyance Status.pdf PDF
Attachment 0006 - Past Performance Information.docx DOCX document
Attachment 0009 - A and M Tasks (Informational Purposes Only).pdf PDF
Attachment 0011 - MCM Tasks (Informational Purposes Only).pdf PDF
Attachment 0002 - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.doc DOC document
Attachment 0004 - Sample Price Breakdown with Rates.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
PWS Attachment 18 - Standard Report Listing.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 5 - Data Mapping.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 13 - Contract Data Elements.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 11 - Note Categories.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 3 - Sample Appraisal Review Form.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment 20 - Work Assignment Template.pdf PDF
Show all 44

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 19 Vendor Performance Reports

# Requirement Passing

Threshold

Monthly

Performance

Monthly

Outcome

1 Processing Requests for Extension of Time 95 99.13 PASS

2 Processing Appeal Requests for Extension of Time Denials 95 96.52 PASS

3 Processing Requests for Occupied Conveyance 95 100 PASS

4 Processing Requests for Overallowables 95 96.95 PASS

5 Processing Requests for Reconsideration of Overallowables 95 98.5 PASS

6 Processing Requests to Convey with Surchargeable Damage 95 95.33 PASS

7 Processing Appeals with Surchargeable Damage 95 100 PASS

8 Part A Claim Reviews 95 69.74 FAIL

9 Part B, C, and D Claim Reviews 95 99.42 PASS

10 Hard Edit Reviews 95 80 FAIL

11 Hard Edit Not Resolved, Convey Back to Mortgagee 95 0 FAIL

13 Title Review 95 78.84 FAIL

14 Qualitative 7 -- Qualitative Metric Appeal Process

1. The Contractor shall have five (5) business days after receiving the scorecard report to contact their GTR in writing if they need to appeal their qualitative score. The Contractor must provide documentation to support the appeal.

2. The GTR shall have five (5) business days to respond to the Contractor's concern(s).

3. If the GTR does not agree with the Contractor appeal, the GTR will provide a Notice of Decision to the Contractor along with a justification supporting the decision. The GTR will copy the Contracting Officer on the Notice of Decision.

4. If the Contractor does not agree with the Notice of Decision, the Contractor can submit an appeal to the Contracting Officer within five (5) business days, with a copy to the GTR, for a final determination.

5. The Contracting Officer will provide their decision to the Contractor, with a copy to the GTR, within five (5) business days.

Scorecard Screen

# Requirement Satisfactory

Exceeding

Threshold

Monthly

Performance

Monthly

Outcome

Contract Period to Date

Performance

Contract Period to

Date Outcome

1 Properties are Put Into Ready to Show Condition in a Timely Manner 95 97 35.29 Not Satisfactory 36.4 Not Satisfactory

2 Hud Inspection Report (HPIR) Completed and Submitted Timely 95 97 56.79 Not Satisfactory 46.26 Not Satisfactory

3 Routine Property Inspections and Supporting Documentation are 95 97 96.11 Satisfactory 78.21 Not Satisfactory

Submitted Timely

4 Identified Imminent Health and Safety Hazards are Abated Immediately 95 97 64 Not Satisfactory 38.46 Not Satisfactory

5 Qualitative 7 10 4 Not Satisfactory 4 Not Satisfactory

Monthly Rating: Not Satisfactory Contract Period to

Date Rating:

Not Satisfactory

Monthly Raw Score: 320/500 Contract Period to 300/500

Date Score:

Qualitative Metric Appeal Process

1. The Contractor shall have five (5) business days after receiving the scorecard report to contact their GTR in writing if they need to appeal their qualitative score.

The Contractor must provide documentation to support the appeal.

2. The GTR shall have five (5) business days to respond to the Contractor's concern(s).

3. If the GTR does not agree with the Contractor appeal, the GTR will provide a Notice of Decision to the Contractor along with a justification supporting the decision. The GTR will copy the Contracting Officer on the Notice of Decision.

4. If the Contractor does not agree with the Notice of Decision, the Contractor can submit an appeal to the Contracting Officer within five (5) business days, with a copy to the GTR, for a final determination.

5. The Contracting Officer will provide their decision to the Contractor, with a copy to the GTR, within five (5) business days.

Outcome Point Value* Criteria

Not Satisfactory (Red) 60 Two or more elements are "Not Satisfactory".

Satisfactory (Green) 80 No more than one element is "Not Satisfactory", but

Contractor does not meet "Exceeding" criteria.

Exceeding (Gold) 100 No elements are "Not Satisfactory" and no more than two are "Satisfactory".

*Point values are only used internally by HUD for the purpose of ranking overall performance relative to peers

Scorecard Screen

# Requirement Satisfactory

Exceeding

Threshold

Monthly

Performance

Monthly

Outcome

Contract Period to Date

Performance

Contract Period to

Date Outcome

1 Marketing Strategy Promotes Sales to Actual Owner Occupants 55 65 42.03 Not Satisfactory 52.24 Not Satisfactory

2 Inspections Initial Ready to List and Ready to Close Inspections are 95 98 100 Exceeding 98.59 Exceeding

Completed Accurately and Timely

3 Average Days to Close 45 30 32 Satisfactory 35 Satisfactory

4 Percent of Properties Under Contract 45 51 34.64 Not Satisfactory 38 Not Satisfactory

5 Average Days to List 17 12 13 Satisfactory 13 Satisfactory

6 Average Days on Market 45 29 43 Satisfactory 35 Satisfactory

7 Qualitative 7 10 10 Exceeding 8.8 Satisfactory

Monthly Rating: Not Satisfactory Contract Period to

Date Rating:

Not Satisfactory

Monthly Raw Score: 560/700 Contract Period to 540/700

Date Score:

Qualitative Metric Appeal Process

1. The Contractor shall have five (5) business days after receiving the scorecard report to contact their GTR in writing if they need to appeal their qualitative score.

The Contractor must provide documentation to support the appeal.

2. The GTR shall have five (5) business days to respond to the Contractor's concern(s).

3. If the GTR does not agree with the Contractor appeal, the GTR will provide a Notice of Decision to the Contractor along with a justification supporting the decision. The GTR will copy the Contracting Officer on the Notice of Decision.

4. If the Contractor does not agree with the Notice of Decision, the Contractor can submit an appeal to the Contracting Officer within five (5) business days, with a copy to the GTR, for a final determination.

5. The Contracting Officer will provide their decision to the Contractor, with a copy to the GTR, within five (5) business days.

Outcome Point Value* Criteria

Not Satisfactory (Red) 60 Two or more elements are "Not Satisfactory".

Satisfactory (Green) 80 No more than one element is "Not Satisfactory", but

Contractor does not meet "Exceeding" criteria.

Exceeding (Gold) 100 No elements are "Not Satisfactory" and no more than two are "Satisfactory".

*Point values are only used internally by HUD for the purpose of ranking overall performance relative to peers

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .