Past Performance Questionaire (PPQ).docx
DOCX document 53 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Helium
- Solicitation number
- W91CRB-21-R-5002
About this file
This document includes a past performance questionnaire and details of a solicitation for helium. The Army Contracting Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground is seeking helium through an indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contract to support partner nations over 60 months. Only authorized federal helium suppliers may respond to solicitation W91CRB-21-R-5002 by 4:00 pm ET on February 24, 2021 via email. Responses are required to fulfill a foreign military sales requirement. The past performance questionnaire requests evaluations of a contractor's prior work on similar projects to support an award assessment. Respondents are asked to rate contractors on quality, timeliness, cost controls, business relationships, customer satisfaction, management abilities, and technical performance.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W91CRB-21-R-5002 - Amendment 0005.pdf | ||
| W91CRB-21-R-5002 - Amendment 0004.pdf | ||
| W91CRB-21-R-5002 - Amendment 0003.pdf | ||
| W91CRB-21-R-5002 - Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| W91CRB-21-R-5002 - Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| W91CRB-21-R-5002.pdf | ||
| HELIUM PRICE.XLSX | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| APPENDIX A AND CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL).docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
APPENDIX B – PAST PERFORMANCE REQUEST FORM
Dear Sir or Madam:
The US Army Contracting Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, is acquiring supplies of helium needed for aerostat systems to remain operational under an Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity contract in support of partner nations. The contemplated contract will have a length of 60 months.
The US Army is conducting a past performance assessment in anticipation of a possible contract award. An Offeror interested in proposing on this work has identified you as a Point of Contact (POC) on a past or present contract, which the Offeror deems relevant to this effort. We are, therefore, requesting your assistance in completing the attached Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire so that we may evaluate the Offeror in the area of past performance. The Questionnaire has been developed for ease of electronic completion. Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the Offeror’s performance on the contract identified and any additional information that your organization deems relevant to our evaluation team. It is important that your information be as factual, accurate, and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators.
Please complete and submit the Questionnaire within seven (7) days of receipt via e-mail to rem.d.ngo.civ@mail.mil. If you have any questions relative to the enclosed Past Performance Questionnaire, please contact me.
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Sincerely, /S/ Victoria Dorsey Contracting Officer
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
COMPETITION SENSITIVE
APPENDIX C – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Completed questionnaires can be emailed to: Rem Ngo, rem.d.ngo.civ@mail.mil
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. Please complete the attached questionnaire using the following guidance. Handwritten responses are sufficient.
B. Questions 1 through 13 should be completed by the Offeror.
C. Indicate, based on the adjectives (use letter designation below), the company’s performance on the identified program. Assessments should reflect only the contractor-liable performance and will be used in the potential award of a defense contract. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge of or experience with the company, please forward this questionnaire to the appropriate person. The following is a definition of the rating levels:
| E (Excellent) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| V (Very Good) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| S (Satisfactory) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were, or appear to be, satisfactory. |
| M (Marginal) |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| U (Unsatisfactory) |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements, and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions were, or appear to be, ineffective. |
| N/A (Not Applicable) |
| Respondent has no personal knowledge. |
D. Please mark the box under the letter corresponding to your rating, or mark “N/A” if you are unable to provide a rating for an area.
E. Please provide narrative explanations for your answers. Space for your narrative remarks is provided after each area. If more space is required, attach additional sheets.
F. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, please provide your comments on other similar programs for which your activity has contracts with this company.
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
I. BUSINESS AND PROGRAM IDENTIFICATION
1. Company/Division Name:_____________________________________________________________________
2. Program/Project title (for similar projects that have been completed within the last ten years): ___________________________________________________________________________
3. Contracting agency/company:_____________________________________________________________
4. Contract number/solicitation number (as applicable):________________________________________________
5. Description of the contract/project effort (please include magnitude and level of complexity as compared to our project requirements): ___________________________________________________________________________
6. Type of contract/project – list all that apply (e.g., Firm Fixed Price, Time and Materials, and Cost Plus): ______________________________________________________________________
7. Period of Performance: _______________________________________________________________________
a. Original schedule: ___________________________________________________________________________
b. Current or actual schedule:_____________________________________________________________________
c. Primary cause of changes: _____________________________________________________________________
8. Contract dollar value at time of selection/closing: __________________________________________________
a. Original project dollar value: ___________________________________________________________________
b. Current or actual value at time of completion: _____________________________________________________
c. Number of times it was changed: _______________________________________________________________
d. Primary cause of changes: _____________________________________________________________________
9. Current or actual contract value including all changes and exercised options: _____________________________
10. Current or actual completion date, and if not complete, percentage of completion: ________________________
11. Complexity of the project: ____________________________________________________________________
12. Specific role of the Offeror and the person(s) and organization(s) identified as participants in the project (please provide name, title, affiliation, business address, and telephone and fax number for each of the team members: __________________________________________________________________________________
1. Location of each project (street address/city/state/zip code): _______________________________________
PART II - PAST PERFORMANCE
Rating Scale: E=Excellent V=Very Good S=Satisfactory M=Marginal U=Unsatisfactory N/A=Not Applicable
Please provide additional comments if response is “E” or “M.”
QUALITY:
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
1. Conformance with and understanding of tasks detailed in the Statement of Work, Performance Work Statement and/or Delivery/Task Orders.
2. Company’s ability to complete tasks with minimum customer oversight.
3. Overall quality of the project.
4. Accuracy of record keeping and ability to prepare accurate reports.
5. Company’s ability to resolve problems with minimum disruption to operations.
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
TIMELINESS:
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
6. Timeliness in completing individual project(s).
7. Meeting program schedule and monitoring critical milestones.
8. Timeliness in completing reports.
9. Company’s ability to meet the overall performance schedule.
Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________
COST CONTROLS:
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
10. Provided a process for management of program costs.
11. Demonstrated effectiveness in reducing or controlling costs.
12. Demonstrated reasonableness of proposed modifications in cost.
BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:
| Company’s team members and subcontractors: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
13. Cooperation in solving problems.
14. A good relationship with subcontractors.
15. Cooperation and innovation in problem-solving.
16. Compliance with the terms of the contract.
17. Met or exceeded Small Business Goals
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
18. Company’s accessibility and responsiveness to customer questions and concerns.
19. Overall satisfaction with company’s performance of services provided.
MANAGEMENT:
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
20. An adequate and complete management plan.
21. A specific management team dedicated to contract.
22. Company team demonstrated experience in subcontractor management and surveillance.
23. A process or metrics for the evaluation of their own overall management performance.
24. The ability of the contractor to hire and retain a stable workforce.
25. Qualifications and ability of the company’s personnel to meet the contractual requirements over the life of the contract.
TECHNICAL:
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
26. Met the general and detailed tasks under the SOW/PWS.
27. Developed detailed reports.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Would you recommend this company for similar government contracts? If no, why not?
2. Did you encounter any unique problems with the company that we should be aware of in the evaluation of this company?
3. Was a Show Cause letter or Cure Notice ever issued on this contract? If yes, please describe the circumstances and resolution.
4. Please provide any additional comments concerning the contractor’s performance.
5. If you know of anyone else who might have relevant information concerning the contractor’s past performance, please complete the following:
Name:________________________________________________________________________________ Organization/Company:__________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number:_____________________________________________________________________________ Fax Number:______________________________________________________________________________ E-mail Address:______________________________________________________________________________
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .